Read issue number from workflow event in helper scripts (#40969)
Updates edit-issue-labels.sh and comment-on-duplicates.sh to read the
issue number from GITHUB_EVENT_PATH (the workflow event payload) instead
of accepting it as a CLI argument. Simplifies the call signature and
keeps the scripts aligned with the triggering issue.
Also updates the /triage-issue and /dedupe command docs to match.
:house: Remote-Dev: homespace
Read issue number from workflow event in helper scripts (#40969)
Updates edit-issue-labels.sh and comment-on-duplicates.sh to read the
issue number from GITHUB_EVENT_PATH (the workflow event payload) instead
of accepting it as a CLI argument. Simplifies the call signature and
keeps the scripts aligned with the triggering issue.
Also updates the /triage-issue and /dedupe command docs to match.
:house: Remote-Dev: homespace
Post a comment when lifecycle labels are applied to issues (#25665)
When lifecycle labels (needs-info, needs-repro, invalid, stale, autoclose)
are applied to an issue, the author currently only sees a label change with
no explanation. They then get a closing comment days later without ever
being nudged to respond.
Add a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers on issues.labeled and runs a
new lifecycle-comment.ts script to post a comment explaining what's needed
and how long before auto-close.
Extract lifecycle config (labels, timeouts, close reasons, nudge messages)
into a shared issue-lifecycle.ts so the sweep script and comment script
stay in sync. Previously the timeouts were duplicated between the sweep
script and the comment messages.
- needs-info: asks for version, OS, error messages
- needs-repro: asks for steps to trigger the issue
- invalid: links to the Claude Code repo and Anthropic support
- stale/autoclose: explains inactivity auto-close
The script no-ops for non-lifecycle labels, so the workflow fires on every
label event and lets the script decide — single source of truth.
## Test plan
Dry-run all labels locally:
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=needs-info ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=needs-repro ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=invalid ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=stale ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=autoclose ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
Verified sweep.ts still works:
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token) GITHUB_REPOSITORY_OWNER=anthropics GITHUB_REPOSITORY_NAME=claude-code bun run scripts/sweep.ts --dry-run
Post a comment when lifecycle labels are applied to issues (#25665)
When lifecycle labels (needs-info, needs-repro, invalid, stale, autoclose)
are applied to an issue, the author currently only sees a label change with
no explanation. They then get a closing comment days later without ever
being nudged to respond.
Add a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers on issues.labeled and runs a
new lifecycle-comment.ts script to post a comment explaining what's needed
and how long before auto-close.
Extract lifecycle config (labels, timeouts, close reasons, nudge messages)
into a shared issue-lifecycle.ts so the sweep script and comment script
stay in sync. Previously the timeouts were duplicated between the sweep
script and the comment messages.
- needs-info: asks for version, OS, error messages
- needs-repro: asks for steps to trigger the issue
- invalid: links to the Claude Code repo and Anthropic support
- stale/autoclose: explains inactivity auto-close
The script no-ops for non-lifecycle labels, so the workflow fires on every
label event and lets the script decide — single source of truth.
## Test plan
Dry-run all labels locally:
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=needs-info ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=needs-repro ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=invalid ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=stale ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
GITHUB_REPOSITORY=anthropics/claude-code LABEL=autoclose ISSUE_NUMBER=12345 bun run scripts/lifecycle-comment.ts --dry-run
Verified sweep.ts still works:
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token) GITHUB_REPOSITORY_OWNER=anthropics GITHUB_REPOSITORY_NAME=claude-code bun run scripts/sweep.ts --dry-run
Fix issues being auto-closed despite human activity (#26360)
The sweep script was closing issues based solely on when a lifecycle label
was applied, ignoring any human comments posted after the label. This caused
active issues (like #11792) to be closed even when users responded to the
stale warning.
Three changes:
1. Teach the triage bot about stale and autoclose labels so it removes
them when a human comments on the issue.
2. Add a safety net in closeExpired() that checks for non-bot comments
posted after the lifecycle label was applied — if any exist, skip closing.
3. Extend the 10-upvote protection (which previously only applied to
enhancements) to all issue types, in both markStale() and
closeExpired().
Fixes #16497
## Test plan
Trace through scenarios manually:
- Issue with stale label + human comment after → triage removes label;
sweep skips even if triage hasn't run yet (safety net)
- Issue with stale label + no human comment → closes as before
- Issue with 10+ upvotes of any type → never marked stale or closed
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>