TUI deconstruction

The deliverable is an independently buildable headless runtime and a terminal client of that runtime. Preserve working behavior while moving ownership out of codewhale-tui. A lower line count alone does not establish the split.

Audited baseline, 2026-09-09

Source inspection and offline Cargo metadata at ce737266683b found:

Source	Physical Rust lines
crates/tui/src	971,321 in 817 files
crates/tui/src/tui	266,378
crates/tui/src/tools	153,713
crates/tui/src/core	58,378
crates/tui/src/commands	60,951
crates/tui/src/lib.rs	20,327
All of crates/core/src	5,475

Counts include comments, blank lines, tests, and source files that may not be compiled. Dedicated test-source files account for 191,058 lines within the TUI total; additional inline tests remain in other files. The directory named tui also contains domain logic. These are ownership clues, not production LOC, a complete compiler dependency graph, or a language-port estimate.

The current dependencies explain the blockage:

• CLI imports TUI for runtime dispatch and route preferences.
• core/engine.rs imports approval policy, context thresholds, attachment parsing, and roster construction from tui/.
• core/events.rs carries the roster row and session_manager.rs persists the durable context reference; both now name their owning crate (crate::agent_roster::AgentRosterRow, codewhale_core::ContextReference) rather than a tui:: re-export.
• tools/subagent imports engine policy/catalog functions, and implements its own repeated model-request/tool-result cycle in run_subagent.
• crates/core owns request construction and some runtime/session services; the main Engine::run_turn remains inside the TUI crate. The comment in tui/src/core/mod.rs claiming the engine has moved is incorrect.
• core/protocol_parity.rs exhaustively projects internal operations/events, but explicitly has no production consumers. Reuse or retire it during the migration; its existence does not establish client convergence.

single_turn_loop.rs currently counts functions named run_turn. It does not detect run_subagent's execution cycle. A passing name scan is therefore insufficient evidence of one execution implementation.

Runtime split sequence (2026-09-25, supersedes the order below)

The build-graph split runs first; the protocol-client contract follows it. Nothing here is a claim that a step has landed: git log and the ratchet (scripts/runtime-boundary-baseline.json) are the record.

1. Rails. scripts/split/module_graph.py computes the runtime closure (everything reachable from core, tools, runtime_api, runtime_threads, client, llm_client, config and session_manager without passing through tui, commands, remote_control, context_report, composer_* or lib.rs) and counts every reference from it into UI code, UI libraries, modules that move later, and UI intra-doc links. scripts/check-command-crate-boundaries.py runs it in CI: counts may only go down (RS-0).
2. Create crates/runtime (codewhale-runtime) with live code. The first batch is the leaf modules that reference nothing outside the batch in production or test code and touch no UI library. The crate is publishable, because the published codewhale-tui depends on it (RS-2).
3. Cut the upward edges, one blocker per slice, each lowering the ratchet: palette's ratatui dependency becomes an optional default feature (RS-3); the one host_terminal port carries every terminal side effect the runtime needs, starting with raw-mode suspension around interactive children (RS-4); voice capture splits from its slash command (RS-5); the context-window formatter moves to utils (RS-6); notification payload and sound policy move down while delivery (OSC writes, taskbar, title) stays in the TUI behind the port (RS-7); then the engine's terminal-chrome calls, auto-review and risk policy into core::authority, the remaining engine leaks, the command catalog, the lib.rs helpers, and the test-only references.
4. Move the strongly connected core in one rename-only change (about 64 modules; a crate cannot hold half a cycle), after landing its visibility and rustdoc edits in place. Then runtime_api and the modules above the core, then the headless surfaces, then delete the path alias.
5. Then the client contract (behavioral, tracked separately): one engine owner in runtime_threads, runtime-owned queue and steer, approvals as server requests, a runtime-client facade, one protocol method table, and loop convergence.

crates/runtime must never depend on codewhale-tui, codewhale-cli, ratatui, crossterm, ansi-to-tui or a terminal component kit. The TUI is the one terminal-output owner: the runtime reaches the terminal only through host_terminal, which the composition root installs for every host it launches today. Withholding it from stdio hosts (ACP, MCP server, app-server) is a later one-line change, not a code move.

Where this sequence departs from the rest of this document

These three departures are deliberate; each is safe for the stated reason.

1. The config hub does not have to leave first. Once the upward edges are cut, config sits inside the runtime's strongly connected component, so it moves with it. Splitting config into codewhale-config (#6034, #6143) becomes internal runtime work afterwards instead of a precondition.
2. Converging the two loops is not a precondition for moving the engine. That rule assumed the engine would move while run_subagent stayed in the TUI, leaving two loops in two crates. Here both move into the same crate, so convergence stays a client-contract step and the one-loop guard keeps scanning every crate.
3. The move uses one path alias, a single root use codewhale_runtime::{...}; block in the TUI lib.rs, instead of rewriting every caller in the moving change. A rename-only move lets in-flight branches rebase across it; a content rewrite of every caller conflicts with all of them. The alias is the only shim: no wrapper types, no per-item re-exports except the ones crates/cli needs until the headless surfaces move, and it is deleted by a published rewrite script once the moves are done.

The destination below still describes the intended layering, with one change: the engine, turn loop and tools move into codewhale-runtime together (there is no separate codewhale-engine crate), because the engine, tools, config and client form one dependency cycle today. crates/core stays the lower request-construction layer: codewhale-command-contract depends on it, and the runtime needs the contract, so putting the runtime into core would be a Cargo cycle.

Intended ownership

This is the proposed destination, not a claim that the boundaries exist now. Reuse existing crates; introduce only the three cohesive runtime libraries below, with real consumers and all replaced paths migrated in each slice.

Owner	Responsibility
codewhale-tui	Terminal lifecycle, rendering, input, pickers, terminal command presentation. No provider I/O, policy decisions, durable store, or agent loop.
codewhale-cli	Argument parsing, launch/composition, headless command presentation. Existing binary names remain compatible.
codewhale-app-server	HTTP/SSE and stdio transport adapters over the same runtime. Reconcile the embedded Runtime API and existing app-server; preserve external routes and auth.
New codewhale-runtime	Session/thread lifecycle, scheduling, recovery, child supervision, and composition of engine and stores. No model/tool execution loop. Used in process by terminal and server hosts.
New codewhale-engine	The shared parent/child execution implementation, context/compaction, tool dispatch, cancellation, approvals, and typed events.
New codewhale-models	Provider clients, live catalog/pricing resolution, and model routing against canonical config facts. Consolidate existing agent catalog consumers instead of retaining a second seeded registry.
Existing config, secrets, execpolicy	Canonical schema/route identity, credential storage/access, and policy decisions. UI labels stay outside these owners.
Existing tools, mcp, hooks	Tool contracts and implementations, extension transports, and hook execution. Agent/task tools call runtime capabilities; they do not own another agent loop.
Existing state, protocol, core	Persistence, shared wire/domain records, and request construction. Move the existing core runtime service owner into the runtime library as its callers migrate.

Dependency direction: terminal/server -> runtime -> engine -> provider/tool implementations and shared lower-level crates. Tools must not import the concrete engine or runtime host. Use narrow service capabilities at the composition boundary where a tool needs scheduling or agent control; do not introduce a generic service-locator framework or a trait for every helper.

The TUI can retain in-process channels through the existing EngineHandle, Op, and Event seams. HTTP remains a transport for external clients, not a mandatory hop for local terminal use. Keep wire DTOs separate from internal operations containing reply channels or resolved capabilities.

Model judgment and test-time compute

Founder clarification, September 9: the harness should let the model decide when a goal, plan, delegation, further investigation, or verification is useful. Provide enough reasoning and tool-feedback opportunities for that judgment. Do not interpret unwanted automatic goals as a request to forbid inferred goals.

The current goal path has conflicting authorities: operate_goal_from_prompt classifies an instruction with verb/question heuristics before inference, while CreateGoalTool::description tells the model to require explicit goal requests. runtime_handoff additionally tells the model the host already created a goal. Those three policies must become one model-facing contract with runtime-owned state transitions. Explicit /goal commands remain a direct user control.

Reference inspection was local, not a claim about every upstream version:

Snapshot	Useful evidence
Codex 45eec73b11 (2026-09-09)	ext/goal/src/spec.rs leaves goal tool selection to the model but instructs explicit user/system intent. Base instructions let the model choose when planning helps. Goal state and continuation live outside the terminal renderer.
Kimi Code 1414d4602 (2026-08-13; older snapshot)	agent-core exposes CreateGoal with completion criteria and a separate reusable turn loop. Creation guidance accepts explicit autonomous-outcome requests or host goal intake. Thinking effort is mapped against model capabilities.
DSH c389f96bf3 (2026-09-08)	goal/tool-goal explicitly permits inferring a long-running objective from a direct human request. Execution validates top-level human-turn provenance and exact state revisions. Goal state, goal tools, and continuation scheduling are separate consumers.

DSH most directly matches the requested goal discretion. Its runtime validates who may mutate state; the model judges whether persistence benefits the task. Codewhale should preserve that distinction without copying DSH's package count.

Implementation packet, to coordinate separately from mechanical extraction:

1. Remove host-side semantic goal classification. Present the request, session state, tools, and existing goal to the model before deciding on persistence.
2. Revise the existing goal-tool and Operate guidance together: infer a goal when the requested outcome warrants durable continuation and has a useful completion criterion; answer, investigate, or perform ordinary multi-step work without a goal when that suffices. Honor corrections and opt-outs. Explicit user controls and model actions use the same goal state owner.
3. Treat test-time compute as reasoning effort, useful tool-feedback rounds, and evidence-driven revision. auto_reasoning::select currently chooses effort using message keywords; this is another semantic heuristic to replace. Preserve explicit route/effort choices. Let the lead allocate supported effort and execution budgets to work, with additional effort requested for later steps when new evidence makes that useful. Reuse RequestTuning and existing runtime/tool contracts; do not add an always-on classifier or a second agent loop ahead of every prompt.
4. Keep accounting, supported provider limits, permission checks, input provenance, durable state, and cancellation in Rust. Emit current state, remaining authorized resources, and tool/test results as compact feedback. A goal does not grant new spend or execution authority. Preserve the pinned prefix and append changing feedback to history.
5. Qualify judgment with model-driven sessions, not only deterministic mocks. Compare matched tasks at explicit effort/resource settings: a greeting, architecture discussion, one-file repair, large migration, unrelated followup, mid-run correction, false success evidence, cancellation, and repeated failure. Judge objective quality, useful continuation, task completion, verification quality, latency, tokens/cost, and correct stopping. Do not score a run better merely for creating a goal or taking more steps.

Start with the existing model's ordinary reasoning/tool loop. Add independent review or multiple candidate attempts only where measured failures and task stakes justify the extra compute. No model-evaluation runs, provider spend, or performance gains were established by this source audit.

Implementation order (before 2026-09-25)

The runtime split sequence above replaces this order where they differ. Every packet names the predecessor, all consumers, changed dependency edges, and its verification. One owner handles shared manifests and integration. Keep unrelated active work intact; follow the current workspace authority.

1. Remove upward domain dependencies. Finish the existing AppMode and ApprovalMode migration by pointing runtime consumers at their actual config/execpolicy owners. Move durable context-reference records out of file-mention UI; retain composer completion there. Separate worker receipt data from roster glyphs/layout. Move reasoning preference and approval policy out of UI modules, preserving exact route/credential identity. ApiProvider and ProviderKind currently differ for legacy table identity; do not replace one with the other through a lossy cast.
2. Extract provider and tool foundations by cohesive subsystem. Consolidate config schema and catalog facts as each affected consumer migrates. Move provider adapters with their tests into codewhale-models; reuse the existing model-client seam. Grow tools, mcp, hooks, and state in place. Move ordinary file/shell/MCP capabilities first. Leave agent orchestration with the execution owner until step 3; moving all of tools/subagent into a leaf tool crate would preserve a dependency cycle.
3. Converge parent and child execution. Inventory and preserve child budgets, route pins, permissions, tool activation, steering, parking, checkpoints, nested work, and terminal fan-in. Adapt children to the existing engine, then remove the old child model/tool cycle. Use actual parent/child call-path and behavior evidence; the function-name guard alone is not acceptance. Do not couple this semantic migration with the mechanical engine file move.
4. Move the engine and shared host. Once the runtime-to-UI dependencies are gone, move the existing execution implementation into codewhale-engine, with its owning unit tests. Establish one runtime host for terminal, exec, server, scheduling, and recovery. Migrate the existing core runtime and thread-manager consumers fully, preserving on-disk formats, replay cursors, locks, authority, and exact-once terminal events. No second runtime store or speculative replacement turn loop.
5. Finish the clients. Fold the embedded HTTP API into the existing app-server transport surface over codewhale-runtime. Move argument parsing and headless command presentation out of TUI lib.rs into CLI. Slash commands retain presentation in TUI and call the same runtime operations. Prune dependencies, temporary re-exports, and obsolete implementations. Only then resize remaining UI files according to actual responsibilities.

The first bounded source packet is step 1's existing mode imports and durable context-reference records, including every caller. Subsequent packets are chosen from the remaining dependency graph, not from a target crate count.

Moving a definition and repointing its internal callers belong to one complete packet. Mechanical movement and behavioral changes should remain separately reviewable, but do not land temporary re-export shims with their last consumers left for an unspecified future migration. Keep shims only for genuine external compatibility contracts and identify that contract.

Verification and completion

• Preserve the model-facing runtime receipt, prompt/cache-prefix semantics, tool names/order, serialized records, and public commands for mechanical moves. A deliberate behavior fix names and tests the intended difference.
• Move private unit tests with their implementation. A #[path] module split remains in the same compilation unit; it does not reduce the test binary or establish faster builds. Do not make internals public just to relocate tests.
• Exercise local mock-provider parent and child turns, tool approval and denial, streaming, cancel/steer, explicit goals, pause/resume, reconnect, restart recovery, and terminal fan-in at the affected boundaries.
• Goal persistence is independent of Plan/Act/Operate. Let the model decide when persistent tracking benefits the requested work, using context and adequate reasoning time. Remove the host verb heuristic; do not replace it with a blanket explicit-command-only restriction. Explicit user opt-outs, cancellation, and authorized resource limits remain binding.
• The headless runtime and its tests must build with no transitive dependency on codewhale-tui, ratatui, or crossterm. Desktop and terminal consume the same lifecycle and execution authority.
• Measure warmed edit/build/test cycles and peak memory for a provider edit, tool edit, terminal-renderer edit, and locale edit before and after. Record compiler/profile/features/cache state. A leaf change must not recompile the unrelated TUI library test unit to run that leaf's own tests. Relinking a final application is a separate cost; no unmeasured speedup promises.
• Use existing scripts/dev-test.sh / scripts/dev-cargo.sh and focused checks during packets. Integration uses the required repository gates with actual counts. Local tests, full gates, hosted CI, installed artifacts, and PTY behavior remain separate evidence. Follow the workspace's human gates for publication, deploys, and spend.

docs/BUILD_PERFORMANCE.md retains historical measurements. Its older B3 and micro-crate candidate lists are superseded by this dependency-led sequence. The old all-at-once preconditions, test-file-move speed claim, and mandatory uncompleted two-PR shim sequence are retired. A paused migration reports the remaining monolith and unresolved consumers explicitly.