kernel/Documentation/devicetree · openEuler/kernel

pigalsofinedt-bindings: interrupt-controller: arm,gic-v3: Fix EPPI range

文件	最后提交记录	最后更新时间
bindings	dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: arm,gic-v3: Fix EPPI range stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.141 commit fab6b870dfe689495bb369d1c9f8bf3bba8d4658 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/ Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=fab6b870dfe689495bb369d1c9f8bf3bba8d4658 -------------------------------- commit fab6b870dfe689495bb369d1c9f8bf3bba8d4658 upstream. [ Upstream commit 15cfc8984defc17e5e4de1f58db7b993240fcbda ] According to the "Arm Generic Interrupt Controller (GIC) Architecture Specification, v3 and v4", revision H.b[1], there can be only 64 Extended PPI interrupts. [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0069/hb/ Fixes: 4b049063e0bcbfd3 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: arm,gic-v3: Describe EPPI range support") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Brain-farted-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3e49a63c6b2b6ee48e3737adee87781f9c136c5f.1772792753.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>	1 个月前
changesets.rst	docs: dt: Make 'Devicetree' wording more consistent There's a variety of ways 'Devicetree' has been written. This is most evident in the documentation build contents where we have 'Device Tree', 'DeviceTree', etc. The DT spec has somewhat standardized on 'Devicetree', so let's use that. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325164713.1296407-5-robh@kernel.org	5 年前
dynamic-resolution-notes.rst	docs: dt: Make 'Devicetree' wording more consistent There's a variety of ways 'Devicetree' has been written. This is most evident in the documentation build contents where we have 'Device Tree', 'DeviceTree', etc. The DT spec has somewhat standardized on 'Devicetree', so let's use that. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325164713.1296407-5-robh@kernel.org	5 年前
index.rst	docs: dt: Add DT API documentation The kernel-doc for the DT APIs are not included in the documentation build. Add them. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325164713.1296407-9-robh@kernel.org	5 年前
kernel-api.rst	docs: dt: Add DT API documentation The kernel-doc for the DT APIs are not included in the documentation build. Add them. Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210325164713.1296407-9-robh@kernel.org	5 年前
of_unittest.rst	of: unittest: add program to process EXPECT messages If unittest detects a problem it will print a warning or error message to the console. Unittest also triggers warning and error messages from other kernel code as a result of intentionally bad unittest data. This has led to confusion as to whether the triggered messages are an expected result of a test or whether there is a real problem that is independent of unittest. EXPECT messages were added to unittest to report each triggered message that is expected, resulting in verbose console output. scripts/dtc/of_unittest is a new program that processes the EXPECT messages to determine whether the triggered messages occurred and also removes the excess verbosity of the EXPECT messages. More information is available from 'scripts/dtc/of_unittest_expect --help'. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201181413.2719955-1-frowand.list@gmail.com	4 年前
overlay-notes.rst	of: overlay: rework overlay apply and remove kfree()s Fix various kfree() issues related to of_overlay_apply(). - Double kfree() of fdt and tree when init_overlay_changeset() returns an error. - free_overlay_changeset() free the root of the unflattened overlay (variable tree) instead of the memory that contains the unflattened overlay. - For the case of a failure during applying an overlay, move kfree() of new_fdt and overlay_mem into free_overlay_changeset(), which is called by the function that allocated them. - For the case of removing an overlay, the kfree() of new_fdt and overlay_mem remains in free_overlay_changeset(). - Check return value of of_fdt_unflatten_tree() for error instead of checking the returned value of overlay_root. - When storing pointers to allocated objects in ovcs, do so as near to the allocation as possible instead of in deeply layered function. More clearly document policy related to lifetime of pointers into overlay memory. Double kfree() Reported-by: Slawomir Stepien <slawomir.stepien@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420222505.928492-3-frowand.list@gmail.com	4 年前
usage-model.rst	docs: dt: fix documented Primecell compatible string Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell peripherals. Current code agrees with that. Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9e137548c4e76e0d8deef6d49460cb37897934ca.1682333574.git.baruch@tkos.co.il Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>	3 年前