文件最后提交记录最后更新时间
[various] Update all packages to Pigeon 26 (#10450) Pigeon versions <26.0.4 aren't compatible with analyzer 8.x, which is causing conflicts for flutter/flutter, so this updates the entire repo to 26. Related: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/178270 Manual fixes: - Updates camera_android_camerax and webview_flutter_android for https://github.com/flutter/packages/pull/9515 - Adds the pigeonVar_* overrides to the url_launcher_windows tests - Removes equality extensions to Pigeon data classes in in_app_purchase_storekit, as they are now generated by Pigeon, causing redeclaration errors. ## Pre-Review Checklist [^1]: Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling.6 个月前
[various] Scrub pre-iOS-13 code (#9849) For all packages that had conditionals to support iOS <13: - Update the min Flutter version to 3.35, which requires iOS 13 - Remove the conditional logic - Update all the project metadata to require iOS 13+ (and macOS 10.15+ where applicable) There is also some minor cleanup in in_app_purchase_storekit; just removing conditionals would have left cases where we were unnecessarily constructing dictionaries dynamically, so I folded them into the initial dictionary construction, and while doing that I noticed some cases where we were doing other unnecessary dynamic construction (maybe due to previous OS conditionals?) so I updated those as well. And then I noticed some inconsistency in use of WithCapacity: and updated those cases to be consistent. Lastly, I fixed a few stale comments that didn't reflect the current state of the code. Includes autoformat changes, since updating the min Dart SDK opts into some formatter changes. Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/167735 ## Pre-Review Checklist **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the gemini-code-assist bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. [^1]: Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling.8 个月前