GGreg Kroah-Hartmankselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests
| 文件 | 最后提交记录 | 最后更新时间 |
|---|---|---|
kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel Add a testcase to check that user address with valid/invalid mte tag works in kernel mode. This test verifies that the kernel API's __arch_copy_from_user/__arch_copy_to_user works by considering if the user pointer has valid/invalid allocation tags. In MTE sync mode, file memory read/write and other similar interfaces fails if a user memory with invalid tag is accessed in kernel. In async mode no such failure occurs. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-7-amit.kachhap@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix compilation with native compiler [ Upstream commit 4a423645bc2690376a7a94b4bb7b2f74bc6206ff ] The mte selftest Makefile contains a check for GCC, to add the memtag -march flag to the compiler options. This check fails if the compiler is not explicitly specified, so reverts to the standard "cc", in which case --version doesn't mention the "gcc" string we match against: $ cc --version | head -n 1 cc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0 This will not add the -march switch to the command line, so compilation fails: mte_helper.S: Assembler messages: mte_helper.S:25: Error: selected processor does not support irg x0,x0,xzr' mte_helper.S:38: Error: selected processor does not support gmi x1,x0,xzr' ... Actually clang accepts the same -march option as well, so we can just drop this check and add this unconditionally to the command line, to avoid any future issues with this check altogether (gcc actually prints basename(argv[0]) when called with --version). Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broone@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319165334.29213-2-andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_buffer_fill test The check_buffer_fill test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 20) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: e9b60476bea0 ("kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-2-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_child_memory test The check_child_memory test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 12) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: dfe537cf4718 ("kselftest/arm64: Check forked child mte memory accessibility") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_ksm_options test The check_ksm_options test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 4) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: f981d8fa2646 ("kselftest/arm64: Verify KSM page merge for MTE pages") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-6-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_mmap_options test The check_mmap_options test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 22) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: 53ec81d23213 ("kselftest/arm64: Verify all different mmap MTE options") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-5-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_tags_inclusion test The check_tags_inclusion test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 4) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: f3b2a26ca78d ("kselftest/arm64: Verify mte tag inclusion via prctl") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-3-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Fix check_user_mem test The check_user_mem test reports the error below because the test plan is not declared correctly: # Planned tests != run tests (0 != 4) Fix the test adding the correct test plan declaration. Fixes: 4dafc08d0ba4 ("kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel") Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026121248.2340-7-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: mte: Fix misleading output when skipping tests [ Upstream commit 83e5dcbece4ea67ec3ad94b897e2844184802fd7 ] When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are clearer. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> | 4 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel Add a testcase to check that user address with valid/invalid mte tag works in kernel mode. This test verifies that the kernel API's __arch_copy_from_user/__arch_copy_to_user works by considering if the user pointer has valid/invalid allocation tags. In MTE sync mode, file memory read/write and other similar interfaces fails if a user memory with invalid tag is accessed in kernel. In async mode no such failure occurs. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-7-amit.kachhap@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Add utilities and a test to validate mte memory This test checks that the memory tag is present after mte allocation and the memory is accessible with those tags. This testcase verifies all sync, async and none mte error reporting mode. The allocated mte buffers are verified for Allocated range (no error expected while accessing buffer), Underflow range, and Overflow range. Different test scenarios covered here are, * Verify that mte memory are accessible at byte/block level. * Force underflow and overflow to occur and check the data consistency. * Check to/from between tagged and untagged memory. * Check that initial allocated memory to have 0 tag. This change also creates the necessary infrastructure to add mte test cases. MTE kselftests can use the several utility functions provided here to add wide variety of mte test scenarios. GCC compiler need flag '-march=armv8.5-a+memtag' so those flags are verified before compilation. The mte testcases can be launched with kselftest framework as, make TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte kselftest or compiled as, make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS=mte CC='compiler' Co-developed-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Gabor Kertesz <gabor.kertesz@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-2-amit.kachhap@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 | |
kselftest/arm64: Check mte tagged user address in kernel Add a testcase to check that user address with valid/invalid mte tag works in kernel mode. This test verifies that the kernel API's __arch_copy_from_user/__arch_copy_to_user works by considering if the user pointer has valid/invalid allocation tags. In MTE sync mode, file memory read/write and other similar interfaces fails if a user memory with invalid tag is accessed in kernel. In async mode no such failure occurs. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com> Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002115630.24683-7-amit.kachhap@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 5 年前 |