文件最后提交记录最后更新时间
selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest Use the new eeh_dev_check and eeh_dev_break interfaces to test EEH recovery. Historically this has been done manually using platform specific EEH error injection facilities (e.g. via RTAS). However, documentation on how to use these facilities is haphazard at best and non-existent at worst so it's hard to develop a cross-platform test. The new debugfs interfaces allow the kernel to handle the platform specific details so we can write a more generic set of sets. This patch adds the most basic of recovery tests where: a) Errors are injected and recovered from sequentially, b) Errors are not injected into PCI-PCI bridges, such as PCIe switches. c) Errors are only injected into device function zero. d) No errors are injected into Virtual Functions. a), b) and c) are largely due to limitations of Linux's EEH support. EEH recovery is serialised in the EEH recovery thread which forces a). Similarly, multi-function PCI devices are almost always grouped into the same PE so injecting an error on one function exercises the same code paths. c) is because we currently more or less ignore PCI bridges during recovery and assume that the recovered topology will be the same as the original. d) is due to the limits of the eeh_dev_break interface. With the current implementation we can't inject an error into a specific VF without potentially causing additional errors on other VFs. Due to the serialised recovery process we might end up timing out waiting for another function to recover before the function of interest is recovered. The platform specific error injection facilities are finer-grained and allow this capability, but doing that requires working out how to use those facilities first. Basicly, it's better than nothing and it's a base to build on. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190903101605.2890-15-oohall@gmail.com6 年前
selftests/powerpc: Make the test check in eeh-basic.sh posix compliant [ Upstream commit 3db380570af7052620ace20c29e244938610ca71 ] The == operand is a bash extension, thus this will fail on Ubuntu with: ./eeh-basic.sh: 89: test: 2: unexpected operator As the /bin/sh on Ubuntu is pointed to DASH. Use -eq to fix this posix compatibility issue. Fixes: 996f9e0f93f162 ("selftests/powerpc: Fix eeh-basic.sh exit codes") Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228043459.14281-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>5 年前
selftests/powerpc: Squash spurious errors due to device removal For drivers that don't have the error handling callbacks we implement recovery by removing the device and re-probing it. This causes the sysfs directory for the PCI device to be removed which causes the following spurious error to be printed when checking the PE state: Breaking 0005:03:00.0... ./eeh-basic.sh: line 13: can't open /sys/bus/pci/devices/0005:03:00.0/eeh_pe_state: no such file 0005:03:00.0, waited 0/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 1/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 2/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 3/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 4/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 5/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 6/60 0005:03:00.0, waited 7/60 0005:03:00.0, Recovered after 8 seconds We currently try to avoid this by checking if the PE state file exists before reading from it. This is however inherently racy so re-work the state checking so that we only read from the file once, and we squash any errors that occur while reading. Fixes: 85d86c8aa52e ("selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest") Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727010127.23698-1-oohall@gmail.com5 年前