Closed
CVE-2026-25679 #84
openeuler-ci-botAdd on  Mar 18Closed at  Sep 11
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Create

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2026-25679
漏洞归属组件:git-lfs
漏洞归属的版本:2.12.0,3.2.0,3.5.1,3.6.1,3.7.0,3.7.1
CVSS评分:
BaseScore:7.5 High
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述:
[ announces: , We have just released Go versions 1.26.1 and 1.25.8, minor point releases. n nThese releases include 5 security fixes following the security policy: n n * crypto/x509: incorrect enforcement of email constraints n n When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing n multiple email address constraints (composed of the full email address) n which share common local portions (the portion of the address before the @ n character) but different domain portions (the portion of the address after n the @ character), these constraints will not be properly applied, and only n the last constraint will be considered. n n This can allow certificates in the chain containing email addresses which n are either not permitted or excluded by the relevant constraints to be n returned by calls to Certificate.Verify. Since the name constraint checks n happen after chain building is complete, this only applies to certificate n chains which chain to trusted roots (root certificates either in n VerifyOptions.Roots or in the system root certificate pool), requiring a n trusted CA to issue certificates containing either not permitted or n excluded email addresses. n n This issue only affects Go 1.26. n n Thanks to Jakub Ciolek for reporting this issue. n n This is CVE-2026-27137 and Go issue , . n n * crypto/x509: panic in name constraint checking for malformed certificates n n Certificate verification can panic when a certificate in the chain has an n empty DNS name and another certificate in the chain has excluded name n constraints. This can crash programs that are either directly verifying n X.509 certificate chains, or those that use TLS. n n Since the name constraint checks happen after chain building is complete, n this only applies to certificate chains which chain to trusted roots (root n certificates either in VerifyOptions.Roots or in the system root certificate n pool), requiring a trusted CA to issue certificates containing malformed DNS n names. n n This issue only affects Go 1.26. n n Thanks to Jakub Ciolek for reporting this issue. n n This is CVE-2026-27138 and Go issue , . n n * html/template: URLs in meta content attribute actions are not escaped n n Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are n not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv n attribute with the value refresh . n n A new GODEBUG setting has been added, htmlmetacontenturlescape, which can be n used to disable escaping URLs in actions in the meta content attribute which n follow url= by setting htmlmetacontenturlescape=0. n n This is CVE-2026-27142 and Go issue , . n n * net/url: reject IPv6 literal not at start of host n n The Go standard library function net/url.Parse insufficiently n validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs n by effectively treating garbage before an IP-literal as ignorable. n The function should have rejected this as invalid. n n To prevent this behavior, net/url.Parse now rejects IPv6 literals n that do not appear at the start of the host subcomponent of a URL. n n Thanks to Masaki Hara ( , ) of Wantedly. n n This is CVE-2026-25679 and Go issue , . n n * os: FileInfo can escape from a Root n n On Unix platforms, when listing the contents of a directory using n File.ReadDir or File.Readdir the returned FileInfo could reference n a file outside of the Root in which the File was opened. n n The contents of the FileInfo were populated using the lstat system n call, which takes the path to the file as a parameter. If a component n of the full path of the file described by the FileInfo is replaced with n a symbolic link, the target of the lstat can be directed to another n location on the filesystem. n n The impact of this escape is limited to reading metadata provided by n lstat from arbitrary locations on the filesystem. This could be used n to probe for the presence or absence of files as well as gleaning n metadata like file sizes, but does not permit reading or writing files n outside the root. n n The FileInfo is now populated using fstatat. n n Thank you to Miloslav Trmač of Red Hat for reporting this issue. n n This is CVE-2026-27139 and Go issue , . n nView the release notes for more information: , You can download binary and source distributions from the Go website: , To compile from source using a Git clone, update to the release with ngit checkout go1.26.1 and build as usual. n nThanks to everyone who contributed to the releases. n nCheers, nCherry and David for the Go team ]
漏洞公开时间:2026-03-07 06:16:00
漏洞创建时间:2026-03-18 08:54:00
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25679

更多参考(点击展开)
参考来源 参考链接 来源链接
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8167
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8484
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19133
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10184
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48036
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17287
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26527
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16102
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28893
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19185
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9109
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56910
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6382
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14774
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21696
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19181
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26585
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54191
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25127
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9440
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9044
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:40118
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14868
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49944
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36317
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8877
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8322
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21769
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9448
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29702
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34365
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19027
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6720
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8490
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:40945
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:52389
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5549
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5110
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8853
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9439
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5941
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24386
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13643
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11768
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7385
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25252
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19207
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9435
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12029
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7833
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13512
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20581
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7291
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17040
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19017
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:52391
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6341
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9093
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7876
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22714
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21655
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12031
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445356
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6949
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8847
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10712
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9097
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:52390
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25043
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14100
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20584
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11996
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12282
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51288
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6344
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11375
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20088
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8842
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12030
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7877
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54757
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13642
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11686
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8856
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8852
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29195
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9461
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5944
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19353
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9434
https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4601
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12028
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28441
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8456
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25253
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22450
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15091
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28961

漏洞分析指导链接:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息:

详情(点击展开)

无

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
新版本的git-lfs中该漏洞已修复
openEuler评分:
7.5
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(3.8.0):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(3.6.1):受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(3.8.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(3.6.1):否

原因说明:
1.master(3.8.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):正常修复
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(3.6.1):正常修复

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Added label: CVE/UNFIXED
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Comments:

issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.


影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(3.7.1):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(3.7.1):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):

原因说明:
1.master(3.7.1):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(3.5.1):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(3.2.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(3.6.1):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(3.6.1):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(3.6.1):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(3.6.1):


原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意:版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应,例如master版本分支受影响,那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!):

分支状态
原因说明 使用场景
受影响 正常修复 受影响且需要修复(包含升级版本修复)的漏洞;
受影响且已经修复的漏洞(历史修复PR也需要关联issue);
若因特殊原因无法修复,应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】,并在安委会备案相关情况。
受影响 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 已关注到相关漏洞,正在处理,未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。
受影响 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。
受影响 不修复-超出修复范围 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。
受影响 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞,或评估后无法升级修复,应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。
【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。
不受影响 不受影响-组件不存在 软件不受影响,因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。
不受影响 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 易受攻击的组件存在,并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是,易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问,包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 产品不受影响,因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是,有问题的组件存在,但由于某种原因(例如安全的编译器选项)使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Added label: sig/Infrastructure
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Comments:

Welcome To openEuler Community

Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.

Bot Usage Manual

I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.

Contact Guide

If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Infrastructure ,
and any of the maintainers: @TommyLike, @genedna, @georgecao, @yikunkero, @zhongjun2, @zhuchunyi ,
and any of the committers: @Zherphy .

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 18 Comments:
参考网址 关联pr 状态 补丁链接
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-25679
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-25679NoneNonehttps://github.com/golang/go/commit/d8174a9500d53784594b198f6195d1fae8dfe803
https://github.com/golang/go/commit/65c7d7a9fb3a9d1fbf1e702a211b8cc3a7bedb53
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-25679
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-25679NoneNonehttps://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/project

说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Mar 19 Modify description of issue
23 event messages are collapsed here。 See more
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Close issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Comments:

经过cve-manager解析,部分字段填写错误,如红色字体所示:

影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
(请填写此字段)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:(请填写此字段)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:(请填写此字段)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)

原因说明:
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:(请填写此字段)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Modify description of issue
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Reopen issue
zhouyizhouyiCollaborators
Sep 11 Associated pull request
zhouyi
zhouyiCollaborators
Sep 11 Comments:

影响性分析说明:
新版本的git-lfs中该漏洞已修复

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.5 High
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明:
1.master:正常修复
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Modify description of issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Comments:

@Zherphy 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 新版本的git-lfs中该漏洞已修复
已分析 2.openEulerScore 7.5
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:正常修复,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Comments:

经过cve-manager解析,所有PR均已合入

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 changed custom state from 待办的 to 已完成
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Close issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Comments:

经过cve-manager解析,所有PR均已合入

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Removed label: CVE/UNFIXED
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-botCollaborators
Sep 11 Added label: CVE/FIXED