一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2025-40030
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：N/A None
Vector：
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name()While the API contract in docs doesn t specify it explicitly, thegeneric implementation of the get_function_name() callback from structpinmux_ops - pinmux_generic_get_function_name() - can fail and returnNULL. This is already checked in pinmux_check_ops() so add a similarcheck in pinmux_func_name_to_selector() instead of passing the returnedpointer right down to strcmp() where the NULL can get dereferenced. Thisis normal operation when adding new pinfunctions.
漏洞公开时间：2025-10-28 20:15:36
漏洞创建时间：2025-10-28 20:56:02
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40030

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name()While the API contract in docs doesn't specify it explicitly, thegeneric implementation of the get_function_name() callback from structpinmux_ops - pinmux_generic_get_function_name() - can fail and returnNULL. This is already checked in pinmux_check_ops() so add a similarcheck in pinmux_func_name_to_selector() instead of passing the returnedpointer right down to strcmp() where the NULL can get dereferenced. Thisis normal operation when adding new pinfunctions.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-40030 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.12.33):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.12.33):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发