@Hly2700w ,@dengmengmian ,@georgecao ,@zhongjun2 ,@yao-xiaobai ,@openeuler-ci-bot ,@openeuler-infra-bot ,@LiYanghang00 ,@ibforu ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kaitiandu ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@allen-shi ,@yeweihua999 ,@shu-shengming ,@oekernel ,@stavewu ,@wkfxxx ,@TrueAI ,@xukuohai ,@kevinzhu1 ,@wsoydl ,@koishimind ,@yuehaibing_planb ,@liulongfang ,@hongwu-wang ,@kile2009 ,@Tankll2021 ,@kazero00 ,@hu-chunzhi ,@mingqian218472 ,@chriszjh ,@zeng_zhaorong ,@gaojuxin09 ,@zhangyi089 ,@yonghu_4dc5 ,@stkid ,@young-sun ,@hanjunguo ,@rock_hw ,@chenjiesong ,@xingmz1 ,@caixu-blue ,@mufengyan ,@guzitao ,@hanliyang ,@zhengzengkai ,@sanglipeng ,@duanqiangwen ,@fangfeng123 ,@whoisxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@hellotcc ,@zhang-changzhong ,@lostway1 ,@gongleihuawei ,@li-huisong ,@hjx_gitff ,@junlong-zheng ,@fanghaiqinghw ,@chenke2026 ,@lujialin2 ,@ibforu2nd ,@LiuYongQiang0816 ,@jerry_lilijun ,@linan888 ,@linyunsheng ,@zqiao216 ,@markyuan4ta21 ,@openLiBingCI ,@openLiBing-bot ,@linqian0322 ,@wenjunryou
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.12.33):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.12.33):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
原因说明:
1.master(6.12.33):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意:版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应,例如master版本分支受影响,那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!):
| 分支状态 | 原因说明 |
|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-待升级版本修复 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitcode.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.gitcode.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue


Welcome To openEuler Community
Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.
Bot Usage Manual
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.
Contact Guide
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @zeng_zhaorong, @zhengzengkai ,
and any of the committers: @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @allen-shi, @caixu-blue, @chenjiesong, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gaojuxin09, @gongleihuawei, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @junlong-zheng, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @koishimind, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @markyuan4ta21, @mingqian218472, @mufengyan, @qinirao, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @stavewu, @stkid, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zqiao216 .


| 参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-68363 | |||
| http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2025-68363 | |||
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68363 | |||
| https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68363 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/project |
| https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2025-68363 | |||
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-68363 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1


CVE-2025-68363
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Check skb->transport_header is set in bpf_skb_check_mtu
The bpf_skb_check_mtu helper needs to use skb->transport_header when
the BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS flag is used:
bpf_skb_check_mtu(skb, ifindex, &mtu_len, 0, BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)
The transport_header is not always set. There is a WARN_ON_ONCE
report when CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is enabled + skb->gso_size is set +
bpf_prog_test_run is used:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2216 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:3071
skb_gso_validate_network_len
bpf_skb_check_mtu
bpf_prog_3920e25740a41171_tc_chk_segs_flag # A test in the next patch
bpf_test_run
bpf_prog_test_run_skb
For a normal ingress skb (not test_run), skb_reset_transport_header
is performed but there is plan to avoid setting it as described in
commit 2170a1f09148 ("net: no longer reset transport_header in __netif_receive_skb_core()").
This patch fixes the bpf helper by checking
skb_transport_header_was_set(). The check is done just before
skb->transport_header is used, to avoid breaking the existing bpf prog.
The WARN_ON_ONCE is limited to bpf_prog_test_run, so targeting bpf-next.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-68363 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
原因说明:
1.master(23.08.5):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发


@chiqijun 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:bpf: Check skb->transport_header is set in bpf_skb_check_mtuThe bpf_skb_check_mtu helper needs to use skb->transport_header whenthe BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS flag is used:bpf_skb_check_mtu(skb, ifindex, &mtu_len, 0, BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)The transport_header is not always set. There is a WARN_ON_ONCEreport when CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is enabled + skb->gso_size is set +bpf_prog_test_run is used:WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2216 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:3071 skb_gso_validate_network_len bpf_skb_check_mtu bpf_prog_3920e25740a41171_tc_chk_segs_flag # A test in the next patch bpf_test_run bpf_prog_test_run_skbFor a normal ingress skb (not test_run), skb_reset_transport_headeris performed but there is plan to avoid setting it as described incommit 2170a1f09148 ("net: no longer reset transport_header in __netif_receive_skb_core()").This patch fixes the bpf helper by checkingskb_transport_header_was_set(). The check is done just beforeskb->transport_header is used, to avoid breaking the existing bpf prog.The WARN_ON_ONCE is limited to bpf_prog_test_run, so targeting bpf-next.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-68363 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 5.5 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.


经过cve-manager解析,部分分支PR未合入,如红色字体所示:
原因说明:
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复(PR未合入)
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发


一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2025-68363
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分:
BaseScore:N/A None
Vector:
漏洞简述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:bpf: Check skb->transport_header is set in bpf_skb_check_mtuThe bpf_skb_check_mtu helper needs to use skb->transport_header whenthe BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS flag is used: bpf_skb_check_mtu(skb, ifindex, &mtu_len, 0, BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)The transport_header is not always set. There is a WARN_ON_ONCEreport when CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is enabled + skb->gso_size is set +bpf_prog_test_run is used:WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2216 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:3071 skb_gso_validate_network_len bpf_skb_check_mtu bpf_prog_3920e25740a41171_tc_chk_segs_flag # A test in the next patch bpf_test_run bpf_prog_test_run_skbFor a normal ingress skb (not test_run), skb_reset_transport_headeris performed but there is plan to avoid setting it as described incommit 2170a1f09148 ( net: no longer reset transport_header in __netif_receive_skb_core() ).This patch fixes the bpf helper by checkingskb_transport_header_was_set(). The check is done just beforeskb->transport_header is used, to avoid breaking the existing bpf prog.The WARN_ON_ONCE is limited to bpf_prog_test_run, so targeting bpf-next.
漏洞公开时间:2025-12-24 19:15:59
漏洞创建时间:2025-12-24 18:55:18
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68363
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息:
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:bpf: Check skb->transport_header is set in bpf_skb_check_mtuThe bpf_skb_check_mtu helper needs to use skb->transport_header whenthe BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS flag is used:bpf_skb_check_mtu(skb, ifindex, &mtu_len, 0, BPF_MTU_CHK_SEGS)The transport_header is not always set. There is a WARN_ON_ONCEreport when CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is enabled + skb->gso_size is set +bpf_prog_test_run is used:WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2216 at ./include/linux/skbuff.h:3071 skb_gso_validate_network_len bpf_skb_check_mtu bpf_prog_3920e25740a41171_tc_chk_segs_flag # A test in the next patch bpf_test_run bpf_prog_test_run_skbFor a normal ingress skb (not test_run), skb_reset_transport_headeris performed but there is plan to avoid setting it as described incommit 2170a1f09148 ("net: no longer reset transport_header in __netif_receive_skb_core()").This patch fixes the bpf helper by checkingskb_transport_header_was_set(). The check is done just beforeskb->transport_header is used, to avoid breaking the existing bpf prog.The WARN_ON_ONCE is limited to bpf_prog_test_run, so targeting bpf-next.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-68363 to this issue.
openEuler评分:
5.5
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.12.33):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.12.33):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
原因说明:
1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发