@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
| 分支状态 | 原因说明 |
|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-待升级版本修复 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
CVE-2024-56614
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xsk: fix OOB map writes when deleting elements
Jordy says:
"
In the xsk_map_delete_elem function an unsigned integer
(map->max_entries) is compared with a user-controlled signed integer
(k). Due to implicit type conversion, a large unsigned value for
map->max_entries can bypass the intended bounds check:
if (k >= map->max_entries)
return -EINVAL;
This allows k to hold a negative value (between -2147483648 and -2),
which is then used as an array index in m->xsk_map[k], which results
in an out-of-bounds access.
spin_lock_bh(&m->lock);
map_entry = &m->xsk_map[k]; // Out-of-bounds map_entry
old_xs = unrcu_pointer(xchg(map_entry, NULL)); // Oob write
if (old_xs)
xsk_map_sock_delete(old_xs, map_entry);
spin_unlock_bh(&m->lock);
The xchg operation can then be used to cause an out-of-bounds write.
Moreover, the invalid map_entry passed to xsk_map_sock_delete can lead
to further memory corruption.
"
It indeed results in following splat:
[76612.897343] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2e461108
[76612.904330] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
[76612.909639] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
[76612.914855] PGD 0 P4D 0
[76612.917431] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[76612.921859] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 10318 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #470
[76612.929189] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
[76612.939781] RIP: 0010:xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60
[76612.944738] Code: 00 00 41 54 55 53 48 63 2e 3b 6f 24 73 38 4c 8d a7 f8 00 00 00 48 89 fb 4c 89 e7 e8 2d bf 05 00 48 8d b4 eb 00 01 00 00 31 ff <48> 87 3e 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 16 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 3e bc 05 00 31
[76612.963774] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002e407df8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[76612.969079] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9002e461000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[76612.976323] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffc8fc2e461108 RDI: 0000000000000000
[76612.983569] RBP: ffffffff80000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007
[76612.990812] R10: ffffc9002e407e18 R11: ffff888108a38858 R12: ffffc9002e4610f8
[76612.998060] R13: ffff888108a38858 R14: 00007ffd1ae0ac78 R15: ffffc9002e4610c0
[76613.005303] FS: 00007f80b6f59740(0000) GS:ffff8897e0ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[76613.013517] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[76613.019349] CR2: ffffc8fc2e461108 CR3: 000000011e3ef001 CR4: 00000000007726f0
[76613.026595] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[76613.033841] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[76613.041086] PKRU: 55555554
[76613.043842] Call Trace:
[76613.046331]
[76613.048468] ? __die+0x20/0x60
[76613.051581] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450
[76613.055747] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30
[76613.059649] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80
[76613.063988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140
[76613.067975] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[76613.072229] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60
[76613.076573] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x23/0x60
[76613.080914] __sys_bpf+0x19b7/0x23c0
[76613.084555] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x20
[76613.088194] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
[76613.091832] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[76613.096962] RIP: 0033:0x7f80b6d1e88d
[76613.100592] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 b5 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[76613.119631] RSP: 002b:00007ffd1ae0ac68 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[76613.131330] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f80b6d1e88d
[76613.142632] RDX: 0000000000000098 RSI: 00007ffd1ae0ad20 RDI: 0000000000000003
[76613.153967] RBP: 00007ffd1ae0adc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[76613.166030] R10: 00007f80b6f77040 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffd1ae0aed8
[76613.177130] R13: 000055ddf42ce1e9 R14: 000055ddf42d0d98 R15: 00
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
3.master(23.08.5):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
===========================================================
@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:xsk: fix OOB map writes when deleting elementsJordy says:"In the xsk_map_delete_elem function an unsigned integer(map->max_entries) is compared with a user-controlled signed integer(k). Due to implicit type conversion, a large unsigned value formap->max_entries can bypass the intended bounds check:if (k >= map->max_entries)return -EINVAL;This allows k to hold a negative value (between -2147483648 and -2),which is then used as an array index in m->xsk_map[k], which resultsin an out-of-bounds access.spin_lock_bh(&m->lock);map_entry = &m->xsk_map[k]; // Out-of-bounds map_entryold_xs = unrcu_pointer(xchg(map_entry, NULL)); // Oob writeif (old_xs)xsk_map_sock_delete(old_xs, map_entry);spin_unlock_bh(&m->lock);The xchg operation can then be used to cause an out-of-bounds write.Moreover, the invalid map_entry passed to xsk_map_sock_delete can leadto further memory corruption."It indeed results in following splat:[76612.897343] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2e461108[76612.904330] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode[76612.909639] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page[76612.914855] PGD 0 P4D 0[76612.917431] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP[76612.921859] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 10318 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #470[76612.929189] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019[76612.939781] RIP: 0010:xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60[76612.944738] Code: 00 00 41 54 55 53 48 63 2e 3b 6f 24 73 38 4c 8d a7 f8 00 00 00 48 89 fb 4c 89 e7 e8 2d bf 05 00 48 8d b4 eb 00 01 00 00 31 ff <48> 87 3e 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 16 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 3e bc 05 00 31[76612.963774] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002e407df8 EFLAGS: 00010246[76612.969079] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9002e461000 RCX: 0000000000000000[76612.976323] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffc8fc2e461108 RDI: 0000000000000000[76612.983569] RBP: ffffffff80000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007[76612.990812] R10: ffffc9002e407e18 R11: ffff888108a38858 R12: ffffc9002e4610f8[76612.998060] R13: ffff888108a38858 R14: 00007ffd1ae0ac78 R15: ffffc9002e4610c0[76613.005303] FS: 00007f80b6f59740(0000) GS:ffff8897e0ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000[76613.013517] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033[76613.019349] CR2: ffffc8fc2e461108 CR3: 000000011e3ef001 CR4: 00000000007726f0[76613.026595] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000[76613.033841] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400[76613.041086] PKRU: 55555554[76613.043842] Call Trace:[76613.046331] |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 7.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
一、漏洞信息[76613.048468] ? __die+0x20/0x60[76613.051581] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450[76613.055747] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30[76613.059649] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80[76613.063988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140[76613.067975] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30[76613.072229] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60[76613.076573] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x23/0x60[76613.080914] __sys_bpf+0x19b7/0x23c0[76613.084555] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x20[76613.088194] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0[76613.091832] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53[76613.096962] RIP: 0033:0x7f80b6d1e88d[76613.100592] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 b5 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48[76613.119631] RSP: 002b:00007ffd1ae0ac68 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141[76613.131330] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f80b6d1e88d[76613.142632] RDX: 0000000000000098 RSI: 00007ffd1ae0ad20 RDI: 0000000000000003[76613.153967] RBP: 00007ffd1ae0adc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000[76613.166030] R10: 00007f80b6f77040 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffd1ae0aed8[76613.177130] R13: 000055ddf42ce1e9 R14: 000055ddf42d0d98 R15: 00---truncated---
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-56614
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：7.8 High
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:xsk: fix OOB map writes when deleting elementsJordy says: In the xsk_map_delete_elem function an unsigned integer(map->max_entries) is compared with a user-controlled signed integer(k). Due to implicit type conversion, a large unsigned value formap->max_entries can bypass the intended bounds check: if (k >= map->max_entries) return -EINVAL;This allows k to hold a negative value (between -2147483648 and -2),which is then used as an array index in m->xsk_map[k], which resultsin an out-of-bounds access. spin_lock_bh(&m->lock); map_entry = &m->xsk_map[k]; // Out-of-bounds map_entry old_xs = unrcu_pointer(xchg(map_entry, NULL)); // Oob write if (old_xs) xsk_map_sock_delete(old_xs, map_entry); spin_unlock_bh(&m->lock);The xchg operation can then be used to cause an out-of-bounds write.Moreover, the invalid map_entry passed to xsk_map_sock_delete can leadto further memory corruption. It indeed results in following splat:[76612.897343] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2e461108[76612.904330] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode[76612.909639] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page[76612.914855] PGD 0 P4D 0[76612.917431] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP[76612.921859] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 10318 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #470[76612.929189] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019[76612.939781] RIP: 0010:xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60[76612.944738] Code: 00 00 41 54 55 53 48 63 2e 3b 6f 24 73 38 4c 8d a7 f8 00 00 00 48 89 fb 4c 89 e7 e8 2d bf 05 00 48 8d b4 eb 00 01 00 00 31 ff <48> 87 3e 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 16 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 3e bc 05 00 31[76612.963774] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002e407df8 EFLAGS: 00010246[76612.969079] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9002e461000 RCX: 0000000000000000[76612.976323] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffc8fc2e461108 RDI: 0000000000000000[76612.983569] RBP: ffffffff80000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007[76612.990812] R10: ffffc9002e407e18 R11: ffff888108a38858 R12: ffffc9002e4610f8[76612.998060] R13: ffff888108a38858 R14: 00007ffd1ae0ac78 R15: ffffc9002e4610c0[76613.005303] FS: 00007f80b6f59740(0000) GS:ffff8897e0ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000[76613.013517] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033[76613.019349] CR2: ffffc8fc2e461108 CR3: 000000011e3ef001 CR4: 00000000007726f0[76613.026595] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000[76613.033841] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400[76613.041086] PKRU: 55555554[76613.043842] Call Trace:[76613.046331]
漏洞公开时间：2024-12-27 23:15:20
漏洞创建时间：2024-12-28 00:04:01
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56614
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈[76613.048468] ? __die+0x20/0x60[76613.051581] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450[76613.055747] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30[76613.059649] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80[76613.063988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140[76613.067975] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30[76613.072229] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60[76613.076573] ? xsk_map_delete_elem+0x23/0x60[76613.080914] __sys_bpf+0x19b7/0x23c0[76613.084555] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x20[76613.088194] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0[76613.091832] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53[76613.096962] RIP: 0033:0x7f80b6d1e88d[76613.100592] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 b5 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48[76613.119631] RSP: 002b:00007ffd1ae0ac68 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141[76613.131330] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f80b6d1e88d[76613.142632] RDX: 0000000000000098 RSI: 00007ffd1ae0ad20 RDI: 0000000000000003[76613.153967] RBP: 00007ffd1ae0adc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000[76613.166030] R10: 00007f80b6f77040 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffd1ae0aed8[76613.177130] R13: 000055ddf42ce1e9 R14: 000055ddf42d0d98 R15: 00---truncated---
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:xsk: fix OOB map writes when deleting elementsJordy says: In the xsk_map_delete_elem function an unsigned integer(map->max_entries) is compared with a user-controlled signed integer(k). Due to implicit type conversion, a large unsigned value formap->max_entries can bypass the intended bounds check:if (k >= map->max_entries)return -EINVAL;This allows k to hold a negative value (between -2147483648 and -2),which is then used as an array index in m->xsk_map[k], which resultsin an out-of-bounds access.spin_lock_bh(&m->lock);map_entry = &m->xsk_map[k]; // Out-of-bounds map_entryold_xs = unrcu_pointer(xchg(map_entry, NULL)); // Oob writeif (old_xs)xsk_map_sock_delete(old_xs, map_entry);spin_unlock_bh(&m->lock);The xchg operation can then be used to cause an out-of-bounds write.Moreover, the invalid map_entry passed to xsk_map_sock_delete can leadto further memory corruption. It indeed results in following splat:[76612.897343] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2e461108[76612.904330] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode[76612.909639] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page[76612.914855] PGD 0 P4D 0[76612.917431] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP[76612.921859] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 10318 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #470[76612.929189] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019[76612.939781] RIP: 0010:xsk_map_delete_elem+0x2d/0x60[76612.944738] Code: 00 00 41 54 55 53 48 63 2e 3b 6f 24 73 38 4c 8d a7 f8 00 00 00 48 89 fb 4c 89 e7 e8 2d bf 05 00 48 8d b4 eb 00 01 00 00 31 ff <48> 87 3e 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 16 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 3e bc 05 00 31[76612.963774] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002e407df8 EFLAGS: 00010246[76612.969079] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9002e461000 RCX: 0000000000000000[76612.976323] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffc8fc2e461108 RDI: 0000000000000000[76612.983569] RBP: ffffffff80000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007[76612.990812] R10: ffffc9002e407e18 R11: ffff888108a38858 R12: ffffc9002e4610f8[76612.998060] R13: ffff888108a38858 R14: 00007ffd1ae0ac78 R15: ffffc9002e4610c0[76613.005303] FS: 00007f80b6f59740(0000) GS:ffff8897e0ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000[76613.013517] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033[76613.019349] CR2: ffffc8fc2e461108 CR3: 000000011e3ef001 CR4: 00000000007726f0[76613.026595] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000[76613.033841] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400[76613.041086] PKRU: 55555554[76613.043842] Call Trace:[76613.046331]
openEuler评分：
7.8
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
3.master(6.6.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1161