Star8
82
代码
代码
Issues3338
Pull Requests9
项目讨论
Wiki
分析
Star8
82
已开启
CVE-2026-52980 #15682
openeuler-ci-bot创建于  6月25日
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 创建

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-52980
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：5.5 Medium
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity s deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity s deadline as a stale relative deadline.
漏洞公开时间：2026-06-25 01:17:08
漏洞创建时间：2026-06-25 03:28:15
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52980

更多参考(点击展开)
参考来源 参考链接 来源链接
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026062441-CVE-2026-52980-f55b@gregkh/T/#u
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71bf35caba12bfd9bc23e32b0bcd9e02d1cf1ac
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f4a16200785f49cf02c5b71bdfe7a9dab63f23a
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3c16e1f4a314a20717ab90a41885f8111a242ab
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)
影响的包 修复版本 修复补丁 问题引入补丁 来源
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71bf35caba12bfd9bc23e32b0bcd9e02d1cf1ac ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3c16e1f4a314a20717ab90a41885f8111a242ab ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f4a16200785f49cf02c5b71bdfe7a9dab63f23a ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3 ljqc
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71bf35caba12bfd9bc23e32b0bcd9e02d1cf1ac cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f4a16200785f49cf02c5b71bdfe7a9dab63f23a cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3c16e1f4a314a20717ab90a41885f8111a242ab cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3 cvelistv5

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity s deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity s deadline as a stale relative deadline.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 添加了label：CVE/UNFIXED
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 评论：

issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明：
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：

分支状态
原因说明 使用场景
受影响 正常修复 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞；
受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）；
若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。
受影响 漏洞仍在分析中 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。
受影响 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。
受影响 不修复-超出修复范围 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。
受影响 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。
【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。
不受影响 不受影响-组件不存在 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。
不受影响 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 评论：
参考网址 关联pr 状态 补丁链接
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-52980NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71bf35caba12bfd9bc23e32b0bcd9e02d1cf1ac
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f4a16200785f49cf02c5b71bdfe7a9dab63f23a
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3c16e1f4a314a20717ab90a41885f8111a242ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-52980
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-52980NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/linus/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-52980
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52980NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3da56dc063cd77b9c0b40add930767fab4e389f3
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c71bf35caba12bfd9bc23e32b0bcd9e02d1cf1ac
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f4a16200785f49cf02c5b71bdfe7a9dab63f23a
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3c16e1f4a314a20717ab90a41885f8111a242ab
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-52980NoneNonehttps://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/project

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 添加了label：sig/Kernel
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 评论：

Welcome To openEuler Community

Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.

Bot Usage Manual

I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.

Contact Guide

If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @allen-shi, @baratta, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongbo-lee, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @markyuan4ta21, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @wangboe2022, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zqiao216 .

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 修改了issue 的描述
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
6月25日 评论：

CVE-2026-52980

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entities

A yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entity
enters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.

The failing sequence is:

  1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set.
  2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity
    state, but does not clear rel_deadline.
  3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity().
  4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline
    as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by
    adding the current vruntime.
  5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited
    relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion
    produces an abnormally large deadline.
  6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances
    se->vruntime to se->deadline.
  7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path,
    where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the
    entity weight.
  8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility
    calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible.
    pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a
    later NULL dereference.

A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity's
vruntime was around:

9834017729983308

After yield_task_fair() executed:

se->vruntime = se->deadline

the vruntime jumped to:

19668035460670230

and the deadline was later advanced further to:

19668035463470230

This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large before
yield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.

rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries a
relative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. A
freshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.
Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the other
sched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpret
the new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 3.9
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月25日 issue状态由 待办的 改变为 进行中
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月26日 修改了issue 的描述
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
6月26日 评论：

CVE-2026-52980

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entities

A yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entity
enters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.

The failing sequence is:

  1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set.
  2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity
    state, but does not clear rel_deadline.
  3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity().
  4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline
    as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by
    adding the current vruntime.
  5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited
    relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion
    produces an abnormally large deadline.
  6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances
    se->vruntime to se->deadline.
  7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path,
    where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the
    entity weight.
  8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility
    calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible.
    pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a
    later NULL dereference.

A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity's
vruntime was around:

9834017729983308

After yield_task_fair() executed:

se->vruntime = se->deadline

the vruntime jumped to:

19668035460670230

and the deadline was later advanced further to:

19668035463470230

This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large before
yield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.

rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries a
relative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. A
freshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.
Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the other
sched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpret
the new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月26日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月26日 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 3.9
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
6月26日 评论：

CVE-2026-52980

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entities

A yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entity
enters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.

The failing sequence is:

  1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set.
  2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity
    state, but does not clear rel_deadline.
  3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity().
  4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline
    as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by
    adding the current vruntime.
  5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited
    relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion
    produces an abnormally large deadline.
  6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances
    se->vruntime to se->deadline.
  7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path,
    where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the
    entity weight.
  8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility
    calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible.
    pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a
    later NULL dereference.

A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity's
vruntime was around:

9834017729983308

After yield_task_fair() executed:

se->vruntime = se->deadline

the vruntime jumped to:

19668035460670230

and the deadline was later advanced further to:

19668035463470230

This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large before
yield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.

rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries a
relative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. A
freshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.
Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the other
sched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpret
the new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月26日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月26日 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 3.9
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
6月27日 评论：

CVE-2026-52980

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entities

A yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entity
enters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.

The failing sequence is:

  1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set.
  2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity
    state, but does not clear rel_deadline.
  3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity().
  4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline
    as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by
    adding the current vruntime.
  5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited
    relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion
    produces an abnormally large deadline.
  6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances
    se->vruntime to se->deadline.
  7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path,
    where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the
    entity weight.
  8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility
    calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible.
    pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a
    later NULL dereference.

A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity's
vruntime was around:

9834017729983308

After yield_task_fair() executed:

se->vruntime = se->deadline

the vruntime jumped to:

19668035460670230

and the deadline was later advanced further to:

19668035463470230

This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large before
yield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.

rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries a
relative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. A
freshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.
Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the other
sched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpret
the new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
6月27日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月27日 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 7
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
6月27日 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月15日 修改了issue 的描述
Tengda Wu
Tengda Wu成员
18 天前 评论：

/check-issue

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
18 天前 评论：

@gitee-cmd, @zhujianwei001, @luoyukai, @kylincuilei, @tanjingguo, @tangjie, @mailofzxf, @zeng-wei2000, @Sam-Luo The CVE score needs to be reviewed (the review instruction /approve or /reject means agreement and rejection).

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
18 天前 评论：

@stavewu ,请给出NVD评分和openEuler评分不一致的理由

likedislike
Tengda Wu
Tengda Wu成员
17 天前 评论：

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
17 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
17 天前 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 5.5
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
17 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
Tengda Wu
Tengda Wu成员
16 天前 评论：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
16 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
16 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：

影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline wh...

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发(与受影响版本排查结果不匹配)

likedislike
Tengda Wu
Tengda Wu成员
16 天前 评论：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
16 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
16 天前 评论：

@mingrui-liu 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:sched/fair: Clear rel_deadline when initializing forked entitiesA yield-triggered crash can happen when a newly forked sched_entityenters the fair class with se->rel_deadline unexpectedly set.The failing sequence is: 1. A task is forked while se->rel_deadline is still set. 2. __sched_fork() initializes vruntime, vlag and other sched_entity state, but does not clear rel_deadline. 3. On the first enqueue, enqueue_entity() calls place_entity(). 4. Because se->rel_deadline is set, place_entity() treats se->deadline as a relative deadline and converts it to an absolute deadline by adding the current vruntime. 5. However, the forked entity's deadline is not a valid inherited relative deadline for this new scheduling instance, so the conversion produces an abnormally large deadline. 6. If the task later calls sched_yield(), yield_task_fair() advances se->vruntime to se->deadline. 7. The inflated vruntime is then used by the following enqueue path, where the vruntime-derived key can overflow when multiplied by the entity weight. 8. This corrupts cfs_rq->sum_w_vruntime, breaks EEVDF eligibility calculation, and can eventually make all entities appear ineligible. pick_next_entity() may then return NULL unexpectedly, leading to a later NULL dereference.A captured trace shows the effect clearly. Before yield, the entity'svruntime was around: 9834017729983308After yield_task_fair() executed: se->vruntime = se->deadlinethe vruntime jumped to: 19668035460670230and the deadline was later advanced further to: 19668035463470230This shows that the deadline had already become abnormally large beforeyield_task_fair() copied it into vruntime.rel_deadline is only meaningful when se->deadline really carries arelative deadline that still needs to be placed against vruntime. Afreshly forked sched_entity should not inherit or retain this state.Clear se->rel_deadline in __sched_fork(), together with the othersched_entity runtime state, so that the first enqueue does not interpretthe new entity's deadline as a stale relative deadline.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 5.5
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
16 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike