Star8
81
代码
代码
Issues3098
Pull Requests9
项目讨论
Wiki
分析
Star8
81
已开启
CVE-2026-63860 #16189
openeuler-ci-bot创建于  7月20日
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 创建

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-63860
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：N/A None
Vector：
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn t check for the presence of a 0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.
漏洞公开时间：2026-07-19 23:16:52
漏洞创建时间：2026-07-20 04:16:43
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63860

更多参考(点击展开)
参考来源 参考链接 来源链接
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcd07d3b8ee7a39b344d73aed69c1a68cd9eacdf
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ed3d14fc45d3da6025e7fe4a6a09066856698e2
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abda65bdd13084c771842adaac1f652d0660dd82
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/137b5918931d4d05aa8ea8d3adf67f7224eef63c
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c26a0052cceed4c4d380ee5808b699f937fb58d8
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2c7b39dde2e61df8157066969cc2a408cd3dcd9
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87111356d58d86edb221ba144d261ed83a5b8bbe
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877c043398d5fa0e93919a3d837e5cd7a98a961

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)
影响的包 修复版本 修复补丁 问题引入补丁 来源
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcd07d3b8ee7a39b344d73aed69c1a68cd9eacdf ljqc
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcd07d3b8ee7a39b344d73aed69c1a68cd9eacdf cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ed3d14fc45d3da6025e7fe4a6a09066856698e2 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abda65bdd13084c771842adaac1f652d0660dd82 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/137b5918931d4d05aa8ea8d3adf67f7224eef63c cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c26a0052cceed4c4d380ee5808b699f937fb58d8 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2c7b39dde2e61df8157066969cc2a408cd3dcd9 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87111356d58d86edb221ba144d261ed83a5b8bbe cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877c043398d5fa0e93919a3d837e5cd7a98a961 cvelistv5

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a 0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.18):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.18):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
1.master(6.18.18):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 添加了label：CVE/UNFIXED
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 评论：

issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明：
1.master(6.18.18):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：

分支状态
原因说明 使用场景
受影响 正常修复 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞；
受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）；
若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。
受影响 漏洞仍在分析中 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。
受影响 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。
受影响 不修复-超出修复范围 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。
受影响 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。
【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。
不受影响 不受影响-组件不存在 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。
不受影响 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue

likedislike
devstation-robot
devstation-robot
7月20日 评论：

检测到新建 CVE Issue，CVE-ID: CVE-2026-63860。

你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务：

  1. 分支影响分析

    • 在本 Issue 下评论：/analysis_branches
    • 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响，并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果；

  2. 在指定分支上创建 PR（修复提交）

    • 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（字段均为必填，每个字段单独一行）：
/create_pr

branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
  • 说明：
    • branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表，例如 OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10；
    • name: PR 签名人姓名（如责任人或安全负责人）；
    • email: PR 签名人邮箱；

系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR，并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。

provided by DevStation.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 评论：
参考网址 关联pr 状态 补丁链接
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-63860NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ed3d14fc45d3da6025e7fe4a6a09066856698e2
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c26a0052cceed4c4d380ee5808b699f937fb58d8
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877c043398d5fa0e93919a3d837e5cd7a98a961
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/137b5918931d4d05aa8ea8d3adf67f7224eef63c
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2c7b39dde2e61df8157066969cc2a408cd3dcd9
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87111356d58d86edb221ba144d261ed83a5b8bbe
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abda65bdd13084c771842adaac1f652d0660dd82
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcd07d3b8ee7a39b344d73aed69c1a68cd9eacdf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-63860
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-63860NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/linus/6ed3d14fc45d3da6025e7fe4a6a09066856698e2
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-63860
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63860NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ed3d14fc45d3da6025e7fe4a6a09066856698e2
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c26a0052cceed4c4d380ee5808b699f937fb58d8
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877c043398d5fa0e93919a3d837e5cd7a98a961
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/137b5918931d4d05aa8ea8d3adf67f7224eef63c
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2c7b39dde2e61df8157066969cc2a408cd3dcd9
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87111356d58d86edb221ba144d261ed83a5b8bbe
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abda65bdd13084c771842adaac1f652d0660dd82
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fcd07d3b8ee7a39b344d73aed69c1a68cd9eacdf
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63860

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 添加了label：sig/Kernel
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 评论：

Welcome To openEuler Community

Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.

Bot Usage Manual

I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.

Contact Guide

If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @allen-shi, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongbo-lee, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 修改了issue 的描述
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
7月20日 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 8.4
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
7月20日 issue状态由 待办的 改变为 进行中
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 8.4
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 8.4
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
27 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 8.4
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
27 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
Oopeneuler-infra-bot成员
10 天前 关联了pull request： Fix 2 CVE
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 关闭了 issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 重新打开了 issue
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
10 天前 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 issue状态由 进行中 改变为 待办的
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 8.4
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
10 天前 issue状态由 待办的 改变为 进行中
Oopeneuler-infra-bot成员
9 天前 关联了pull request： RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 关闭了 issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 重新打开了 issue
H
hulk-ci-bot成员
8 天前 评论：

CVE-2026-63860

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING

These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.

Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.

As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 issue状态由 进行中 改变为 待办的
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 评论：

@whoisxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRINGThese attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), butNLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmtspecifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspacedoes include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, andthus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-63860 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 5.5
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
8 天前 issue状态由 待办的 改变为 进行中
Wwentaohu成员
3 天前 关联了pull request：release 4.19.90-2608.4.0
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
3 天前 关闭了 issue
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
3 天前 评论：

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
3 天前 重新打开了 issue