已开启
CVE-2026-72072 #17746
openeuler-ci-bot创建于  22 天前
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 创建

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2026-72072
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分:
BaseScore:7.8 High
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
漏洞简述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC deleteWhen an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freedthe per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s theobject unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RXdatapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC underrcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() andattaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that alreadyobtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate onfreed memory.Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() insteadof freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath todst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dstwhose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a referencewas actually taken.mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath readerthat looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst stillNULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointerwhose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result andmd_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publishhappens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publishthen pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_elementwithout an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it underrcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to afollow-up patch.Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).
漏洞公开时间:2026-08-15 14:21:16
漏洞创建时间:2026-08-18 04:07:58
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72072

更多参考(点击展开)
参考来源 参考链接 来源链接
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088873af13590ebde10de2ade847f57a05ec61c6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2516523
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3cc4218070d6b98bf5fb456dccae424fd38c4f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a4d0c568bbb52c7c04f4fce3c097dae89ed6cb
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2026081519-CVE-2026-72072-111b@gregkh/T
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218cc15a4c907659ad4b0e68c535c61594311205
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72072
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72072
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a5073b7b30243658f58b2d2d35a823da7fd34d9

漏洞分析指导链接:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息:

详情(点击展开)
影响的包 修复版本 修复补丁 问题引入补丁 来源
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a4d0c568bbb52c7c04f4fce3c097dae89ed6cb ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218cc15a4c907659ad4b0e68c535c61594311205 ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a5073b7b30243658f58b2d2d35a823da7fd34d9 ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3cc4218070d6b98bf5fb456dccae424fd38c4f ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088873af13590ebde10de2ade847f57a05ec61c6 ljqc
gregkh/linux https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4 ljqc
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088873af13590ebde10de2ade847f57a05ec61c6 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3cc4218070d6b98bf5fb456dccae424fd38c4f cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a4d0c568bbb52c7c04f4fce3c097dae89ed6cb cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218cc15a4c907659ad4b0e68c535c61594311205 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4 cvelistv5
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a5073b7b30243658f58b2d2d35a823da7fd34d9 cvelistv5

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC deleteWhen an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freedthe per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s theobject unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RXdatapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC underrcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() andattaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that alreadyobtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate onfreed memory.Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() insteadof freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath todst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dstwhose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a referencewas actually taken.mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath readerthat looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst stillNULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointerwhose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result andmd_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publishhappens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publishthen pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_elementwithout an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it underrcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to afollow-up patch.Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (<ahref= https://0sec.ai >https://0sec.ai).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.
openEuler评分:
7.8
Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否

原因说明:
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 添加了label:CVE/UNFIXED
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 评论:

issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.


影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明:
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):


原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意:版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应,例如master版本分支受影响,那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!):

分支状态
原因说明 使用场景
受影响 正常修复 受影响且需要修复(包含升级版本修复)的漏洞;
受影响且已经修复的漏洞(历史修复PR也需要关联issue);
若因特殊原因无法修复,应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】,并在安委会备案相关情况。
受影响 漏洞仍在分析中 已关注到相关漏洞,正在处理,未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。
受影响 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。
受影响 不修复-超出修复范围 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。
受影响 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞,或评估后无法升级修复,应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。
【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。
不受影响 不受影响-组件不存在 软件不受影响,因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。
不受影响 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 易受攻击的组件存在,并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是,易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问,包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。
不受影响 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 产品不受影响,因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是,有问题的组件存在,但由于某种原因(例如安全的编译器选项)使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue

likedislike
devstation-robot
devstation-robot
22 天前 评论:

检测到新建 CVE Issue,CVE-ID: CVE-2026-72072

你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务:

  1. 分支影响分析

    • 在本 Issue 下评论:/analysis_branches
    • 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响,并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果;
  2. 在指定分支上创建 PR(修复提交)

    • 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论(branchnameemail 为必填字段,每个字段单独一行):
/create_pr

branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
backport-engine: opencode
  • 说明:
    • branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表,例如 OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
    • name: PR 签名人姓名(如责任人或安全负责人);
    • email: PR 签名人邮箱;
    • backport-engine(可选):可选 portgptmystiqueopencode;不填时默认使用 portgpt,建议使用 opencode

系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR,并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。

provided by DevStation.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 评论:
参考网址 关联pr 状态 补丁链接
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-72072NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218cc15a4c907659ad4b0e68c535c61594311205
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a5073b7b30243658f58b2d2d35a823da7fd34d9
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088873af13590ebde10de2ade847f57a05ec61c6
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a4d0c568bbb52c7c04f4fce3c097dae89ed6cb
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3cc4218070d6b98bf5fb456dccae424fd38c4f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-72072
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-72072NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/linus/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-72072
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72072NoneNonehttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de74d8fd10291763d97b218f09adcc7513c975e4
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218cc15a4c907659ad4b0e68c535c61594311205
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a5073b7b30243658f58b2d2d35a823da7fd34d9
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/088873af13590ebde10de2ade847f57a05ec61c6
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a4d0c568bbb52c7c04f4fce3c097dae89ed6cb
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3cc4218070d6b98bf5fb456dccae424fd38c4f
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-72072

说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 添加了label:sig/Kernel
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
22 天前 评论:

Welcome To openEuler Community

Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.

Bot Usage Manual

I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.

Contact Guide

If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
21 天前 修改了issue 的描述
hulk-ci-bot成员
21 天前 评论:

CVE-2026-72072

影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC delete

When an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freed
the per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s the
object unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RX
datapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC under
rcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() and
attaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that already
obtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate on
freed memory.

Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() instead
of freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath to
dst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dst
whose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a reference
was actually taken.

mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()
before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath reader
that looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst still
NULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointer
whose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result and
md_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publish
happens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publish
then pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.

Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_element
without an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it under
rcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to a
follow-up patch.

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明:
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
21 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
21 天前 评论:

@wenzhiwei11 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC deleteWhen an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freedthe per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s theobject unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RXdatapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC underrcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() andattaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that alreadyobtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate onfreed memory.Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() insteadof freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath todst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dstwhose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a referencewas actually taken.mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath readerthat looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst stillNULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointerwhose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result andmd_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publishhappens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publishthen pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_elementwithout an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it underrcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to afollow-up patch.Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (<ahref="https://0sec.ai">https://0sec.ai).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 7.8
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
21 天前 issue状态由 待办的 改变为 进行中
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
19 天前 修改了issue 的描述
hulk-ci-bot成员
19 天前 评论:

CVE-2026-72072

影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC delete

When an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freed
the per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s the
object unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RX
datapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC under
rcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() and
attaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that already
obtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate on
freed memory.

Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() instead
of freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath to
dst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dst
whose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a reference
was actually taken.

mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()
before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath reader
that looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst still
NULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointer
whose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result and
md_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publish
happens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publish
then pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.

Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_element
without an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it under
rcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to a
follow-up patch.

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明:
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

likedislike
openeuler-ci-botopeneuler-ci-bot成员
19 天前 修改了issue 的描述
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
19 天前 评论:

@wenzhiwei11 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC deleteWhen an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freedthe per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s theobject unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RXdatapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC underrcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() andattaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that alreadyobtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate onfreed memory.Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() insteadof freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath todst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dstwhose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a referencewas actually taken.mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath readerthat looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst stillNULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointerwhose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result andmd_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publishhappens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publishthen pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_elementwithout an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it underrcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to afollow-up patch.Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (<ahref="https://0sec.ai">https://0sec.ai).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 7.8
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
19 天前 评论:

经过cve-manager解析,部分分支PR未合入,如红色字体所示:

原因说明:
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike
Tengda Wu
Tengda Wu成员
14 天前 评论:

/check-issue

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
14 天前 评论:

@wenzhiwei11 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态 分析项目 内容
已分析 1.影响性分析说明 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5e: macsec: fix use-after-free of metadata_dst on RX SC deleteWhen an offloaded MACsec RX SC is deleted, macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() freedthe per-SC metadata_dst with metadata_dst_free(), which kfree()s theobject unconditionally and ignores the dst reference count. The RXdatapath in mlx5e_macsec_offload_handle_rx_skb() looks up the SC underrcu_read_lock() via xa_load(), takes a reference with dst_hold() andattaches the dst to the skb with skb_dst_set(). A reader that alreadyobtained the rx_sc pointer can race with the delete path and operate onfreed memory.Fix the owner side by dropping the reference with dst_release() insteadof freeing unconditionally, and convert the RX datapath todst_hold_safe() so a reader racing the SC delete cannot attach a dstwhose last reference was just dropped; only attach it when a referencewas actually taken.mlx5e_macsec_add_rxsc() also published sc_xarray_element via xa_alloc()before rx_sc->md_dst was allocated and initialised, so a datapath readerthat looked the SC up by fs_id could observe rx_sc with md_dst stillNULL or, on weakly-ordered architectures, a non-NULL md_dst pointerwhose contents were not yet visible. NULL-check the xa_load() result andmd_dst on the datapath, and reorder add_rxsc() so the xa_alloc() publishhappens only after md_dst is fully initialised; the xarray RCU publishthen pairs with the rcu_read_lock()/xa_load() in the datapath.Note: macsec_del_rxsc_ctx() also kfree()s rx_sc->sc_xarray_elementwithout an RCU grace period while the same datapath reads it underrcu_read_lock(); that is a separate pre-existing issue left to afollow-up patch.Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (<ahref="https://0sec.ai">https://0sec.ai).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-72072 to this issue.
已分析 2.openEulerScore 7.8
已分析 3.openEulerVector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
已分析 4.受影响版本排查 master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
已分析 5.是否涉及abi变化 master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
已分析 6.原因说明 master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

likedislike
openeuler-ci-bot
openeuler-ci-bot成员
14 天前 评论:

经过cve-manager解析,部分分支PR未合入,如红色字体所示:

原因说明:
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围

likedislike