issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):

原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue

检测到新建 CVE Issue，CVE-ID: CVE-2026-74485。

你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务：

1. 分支影响分析

   • 在本 Issue 下评论：/analysis_branches
   • 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响，并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果；

2. 在指定分支上创建 PR（修复提交）

   • 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（branch、name、email 为必填字段，每个字段单独一行）：

/create_pr

branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
backport-engine: opencode

• 说明：
  • branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表，例如 OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10；
  • name: PR 签名人姓名（如责任人或安全负责人）；
  • email: PR 签名人邮箱；
  • backport-engine（可选）：可选 portgpt、mystique 或 opencode；不填时默认使用 portgpt，建议使用 opencode；

系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR，并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。

provided by DevStation.

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

Welcome To openEuler Community

Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.

Bot Usage Manual

I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.

Contact Guide

If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .

CVE-2026-74485

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binfmt_misc: reject a flag character as the field delimiter

The registration string starts with a user chosen delimiter that
separates the individual fields. So that the field parsers terminate
even on a truncated string create_entry() pads the buffer with that
same delimiter:

memset(buf + count, del, 8);

Most fields are scanned for the delimiter with strchr()/scanarg() and
happily stop on the padding. The flags field is different: instead of
scanning for the delimiter check_special_flags() consumes the flag
characters 'P', 'O', 'C' and 'F' and stops at the first byte that is
none of them, relying on the trailing delimiter to end the scan.

If the delimiter is itself a flag character the padding no longer acts
as a terminator. The scan swallows all eight padding bytes and keeps
reading past the end of the allocation until it hits a byte that is
not a flag character. For example registering

PaPEPPxPPiP

with 'P' as the delimiter (name "a", type extension, magic "x",
interpreter "i", empty flags) leaves the flag scan running off the end
of the buffer. The registration is rejected in the end because the
parser does not stop exactly at buf + count, but only after the out of
bounds read has already happened. With an unlucky allocation layout the
scan can walk into an unmapped page; under KASAN it is reported as a
slab out of bounds read. binfmt_misc mounts are available to
unprivileged users in a user namespace so the read is reachable without
privileges.

Reject a delimiter that is one of the flag characters up front. Such a
registration was always rejected anyway, only after the out of bounds
read, so no valid registration string changes meaning.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74485 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

@liulongfang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2026-74485

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binfmt_misc: reject a flag character as the field delimiter

The registration string starts with a user chosen delimiter that
separates the individual fields. So that the field parsers terminate
even on a truncated string create_entry() pads the buffer with that
same delimiter:

memset(buf + count, del, 8);

Most fields are scanned for the delimiter with strchr()/scanarg() and
happily stop on the padding. The flags field is different: instead of
scanning for the delimiter check_special_flags() consumes the flag
characters 'P', 'O', 'C' and 'F' and stops at the first byte that is
none of them, relying on the trailing delimiter to end the scan.

If the delimiter is itself a flag character the padding no longer acts
as a terminator. The scan swallows all eight padding bytes and keeps
reading past the end of the allocation until it hits a byte that is
not a flag character. For example registering

PaPEPPxPPiP

with 'P' as the delimiter (name "a", type extension, magic "x",
interpreter "i", empty flags) leaves the flag scan running off the end
of the buffer. The registration is rejected in the end because the
parser does not stop exactly at buf + count, but only after the out of
bounds read has already happened. With an unlucky allocation layout the
scan can walk into an unmapped page; under KASAN it is reported as a
slab out of bounds read. binfmt_misc mounts are available to
unprivileged users in a user namespace so the read is reachable without
privileges.

Reject a delimiter that is one of the flag characters up front. Such a
registration was always rejected anyway, only after the out of bounds
read, so no valid registration string changes meaning.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74485 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中

@liulongfang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

/check-issue

@liulongfang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2026-74485

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binfmt_misc: reject a flag character as the field delimiter

The registration string starts with a user chosen delimiter that
separates the individual fields. So that the field parsers terminate
even on a truncated string create_entry() pads the buffer with that
same delimiter:

memset(buf + count, del, 8);

Most fields are scanned for the delimiter with strchr()/scanarg() and
happily stop on the padding. The flags field is different: instead of
scanning for the delimiter check_special_flags() consumes the flag
characters 'P', 'O', 'C' and 'F' and stops at the first byte that is
none of them, relying on the trailing delimiter to end the scan.

If the delimiter is itself a flag character the padding no longer acts
as a terminator. The scan swallows all eight padding bytes and keeps
reading past the end of the allocation until it hits a byte that is
not a flag character. For example registering

PaPEPPxPPiP

with 'P' as the delimiter (name "a", type extension, magic "x",
interpreter "i", empty flags) leaves the flag scan running off the end
of the buffer. The registration is rejected in the end because the
parser does not stop exactly at buf + count, but only after the out of
bounds read has already happened. With an unlucky allocation layout the
scan can walk into an unmapped page; under KASAN it is reported as a
slab out of bounds read. binfmt_misc mounts are available to
unprivileged users in a user namespace so the read is reachable without
privileges.

Reject a delimiter that is one of the flag characters up front. Such a
registration was always rejected anyway, only after the out of bounds
read, so no valid registration string changes meaning.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74485 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复

@liulongfang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：

原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围