issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
分支状态 |
原因说明 | 使用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 | 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞； 受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）； 若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。 |
| 受影响 | 漏洞仍在分析中 | 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 | 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 | 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 | 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。 【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 | 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 | 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 | 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 | 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 | 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue
检测到新建 CVE Issue，CVE-ID: CVE-2026-74384。
你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务：
-
分支影响分析
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
/analysis_branches - 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响，并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果；
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
-
在指定分支上创建 PR（修复提交）
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
branch、name、email为必填字段，每个字段单独一行）：
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
/create_pr
branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
backport-engine: opencode
- 说明：
branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表，例如OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10；name: PR 签名人姓名（如责任人或安全负责人）；email: PR 签名人邮箱；backport-engine（可选）：可选portgpt、mystique或opencode；不填时默认使用portgpt，建议使用opencode；
系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR，并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。
provided by DevStation.
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
Welcome To openEuler Community
Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.
Bot Usage Manual
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands.
Contact Guide
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .
CVE-2026-74384
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_head
struct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],
which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:
head->current_path[numa_node_id()]
The structure is currently allocated as:
size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) +
(num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));
head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and densely
packed from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holds
on many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such as
powerpc.
On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:
NUMA:
NUMA node(s): 6
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159
NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79
NUMA node252 CPU(s):
NUMA node253 CPU(s):
NUMA node254 CPU(s):
NUMA node255 CPU(s):
That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255
In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6
So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,
the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,
accesses such as:
head->current_path[8] or
head->current_path[252]
goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV
Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)
[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c
[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220
[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120
[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0
[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10
[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640
[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290
[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:
The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048
The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of
allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
Memory state around the buggy address:
c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
^
c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids instead
of num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximum
possible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()
becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@xukuohai 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_headstruct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:head->current_path[numa_node_id()]The structure is currently allocated as:size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) + (num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and denselypacked from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holdson many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such aspowerpc.On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:NUMA: NUMA node(s): 6 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79 NUMA node252 CPU(s): NUMA node253 CPU(s): NUMA node254 CPU(s): NUMA node255 CPU(s):That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,accesses such as:head->current_path[8] orhead->current_path[252]goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:==================================================================BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNVWorkqueue: async async_run_entry_fnCall Trace:[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)The buggy address belongs to the physical page:Memory state around the buggy address: c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00<spanclass="q">>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc==================================================================Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids insteadof num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximumpossible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-74384
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_head
struct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],
which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:
head->current_path[numa_node_id()]
The structure is currently allocated as:
size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) +
(num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));
head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and densely
packed from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holds
on many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such as
powerpc.
On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:
NUMA:
NUMA node(s): 6
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159
NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79
NUMA node252 CPU(s):
NUMA node253 CPU(s):
NUMA node254 CPU(s):
NUMA node255 CPU(s):
That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255
In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6
So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,
the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,
accesses such as:
head->current_path[8] or
head->current_path[252]
goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV
Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)
[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c
[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220
[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120
[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0
[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10
[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640
[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290
[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:
The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048
The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of
allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
Memory state around the buggy address:
c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
^
c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids instead
of num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximum
possible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()
becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@xukuohai 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_headstruct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:head->current_path[numa_node_id()]The structure is currently allocated as:size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) + (num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and denselypacked from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holdson many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such aspowerpc.On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:NUMA: NUMA node(s): 6 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79 NUMA node252 CPU(s): NUMA node253 CPU(s): NUMA node254 CPU(s): NUMA node255 CPU(s):That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,accesses such as:head->current_path[8] orhead->current_path[252]goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:==================================================================BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNVWorkqueue: async async_run_entry_fnCall Trace:[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)The buggy address belongs to the physical page:Memory state around the buggy address: c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00<spanclass="q">>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc==================================================================Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids insteadof num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximumpossible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
CVE-2026-74384
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_head
struct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],
which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:
head->current_path[numa_node_id()]
The structure is currently allocated as:
size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) +
(num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));
head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and densely
packed from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holds
on many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such as
powerpc.
On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:
NUMA:
NUMA node(s): 6
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159
NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79
NUMA node252 CPU(s):
NUMA node253 CPU(s):
NUMA node254 CPU(s):
NUMA node255 CPU(s):
That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255
In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6
So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,
the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,
accesses such as:
head->current_path[8] or
head->current_path[252]
goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNV
Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)
[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c
[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220
[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120
[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core]
[c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0
[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10
[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640
[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290
[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:
The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048
The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of
allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
Memory state around the buggy address:
c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
^
c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids instead
of num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximum
possible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()
becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@xukuohai 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_headstruct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:head->current_path[numa_node_id()]The structure is currently allocated as:size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) + (num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and denselypacked from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holdson many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such aspowerpc.On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:NUMA: NUMA node(s): 6 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79 NUMA node252 CPU(s): NUMA node253 CPU(s): NUMA node254 CPU(s): NUMA node255 CPU(s):That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,accesses such as:head->current_path[8] orhead->current_path[252]goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:==================================================================BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNVWorkqueue: async async_run_entry_fnCall Trace:[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)The buggy address belongs to the physical page:Memory state around the buggy address: c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00<spanclass="q">>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc==================================================================Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids insteadof num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximumpossible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-74384
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：9.8 Critical
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_headstruct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:head->current_path[numa_node_id()]The structure is currently allocated as:size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) + (num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and denselypacked from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holdson many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such aspowerpc.On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:NUMA: NUMA node(s): 6 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79 NUMA node252 CPU(s): NUMA node253 CPU(s): NUMA node254 CPU(s): NUMA node255 CPU(s):That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,accesses such as:head->current_path[8] orhead->current_path[252]goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:==================================================================BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNVWorkqueue: async async_run_entry_fnCall Trace:[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)The buggy address belongs to the physical page:Memory state around the buggy address: c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc==================================================================Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids insteadof num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximumpossible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.
漏洞公开时间：2026-08-15 14:22:40
漏洞创建时间：2026-08-22 01:47:12
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74384
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:nvme-multipath: fix flex array size in struct nvme_ns_headstruct nvme_ns_head contains a flexible array member, current_path[],which is indexed using the NUMA node ID:head->current_path[numa_node_id()]The structure is currently allocated as:size = sizeof(struct nvme_ns_head) + (num_possible_nodes() * sizeof(struct nvme_ns *));head = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);This allocation assumes that NUMA node IDs are sequential and denselypacked from 0 .. num_possible_nodes() - 1. While this assumption holdson many systems, it is not always true on some architectures such aspowerpc.On some powerpc systems, NUMA node IDs can be sparse. For example:NUMA: NUMA node(s): 6 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 80-159 NUMA node8 CPU(s): 0-79 NUMA node252 CPU(s): NUMA node253 CPU(s): NUMA node254 CPU(s): NUMA node255 CPU(s):That is, the possible/online NUMA node IDs are: 0, 8, 252, 253, 254, 255In this case: num_possible_nodes() = 6So memory is allocated for only 6 entries in current_path[]. However,the array is later indexed using the actual NUMA node ID. As a result,accesses such as:head->current_path[8] orhead->current_path[252]goes out of bounds, leading to the following KASAN splat:==================================================================BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core]Write of size 8 at addr c00020003bda35b8 by task kworker/u641:2/1997CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/u641:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-dirty #14 PREEMPT(lazy)Hardware name: 8335-GTH POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-v6.5.3-35-g1851b2a06 PowerNVWorkqueue: async async_run_entry_fnCall Trace:[c000200037fa7510] [c0000000021c23d4] dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xdc (unreliable)[c000200037fa7540] [c0000000009fda90] print_report+0x22c/0x67c[c000200037fa7630] [c0000000009fd508] kasan_report+0x108/0x220[c000200037fa7740] [c0000000009fff48] __asan_store8+0xe8/0x120[c000200037fa7760] [c008000018e76474] nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x22c/0x290 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7800] [c008000018e6556c] nvme_update_ns_info+0x4a4/0x5e0 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7a50] [c008000018e66270] nvme_alloc_ns+0x6d8/0x1a70 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7c20] [c008000018e679fc] nvme_scan_ns+0x3f4/0x630 [nvme_core][c000200037fa7d10] [c00000000031f22c] async_run_entry_fn+0x9c/0x3a0[c000200037fa7db0] [c0000000002fa544] process_one_work+0x414/0xa10[c000200037fa7ec0] [c0000000002fbf00] worker_thread+0x320/0x640[c000200037fa7f80] [c00000000030d0f8] kthread+0x278/0x290[c000200037fa7fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18Allocated by task 1997 on cpu 1 at 35.928317s:The buggy address belongs to the object at c00020003bda3000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-15-2k of size 2048The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of allocated 1448-byte region [c00020003bda3000, c00020003bda35a8)The buggy address belongs to the physical page:Memory state around the buggy address: c00020003bda3480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c00020003bda3500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00<spanclass= q >>c00020003bda3580: 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ^ c00020003bda3600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc c00020003bda3680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc==================================================================Fix this by allocating the flexible array using nr_node_ids insteadof num_possible_nodes(). Since nr_node_ids represents the maximumpossible NUMA node IDs, indexing current_path[] using numa_node_id()becomes safe even on systems with sparse node IDs.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-74384 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
9.8
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围