检测到新建 CVE Issue，CVE-ID: CVE-2026-80590。
你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务：
-
分支影响分析
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
/analysis_branches - 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响，并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果；
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
-
在指定分支上创建 PR（修复提交）
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
branch、name、email为必填字段，每个字段单独一行）：
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
/create_pr
branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
backport-engine: opencode
- 说明：
branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表，例如OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10；name: PR 签名人姓名（如责任人或安全负责人）；email: PR 签名人邮箱；backport-engine（可选）：可选portgpt、mystique或opencode；不填时默认使用portgpt，建议使用opencode；
系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR，并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。
provided by DevStation.
issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
分支状态 |
原因说明 | 使用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 | 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞； 受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）； 若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。 |
| 受影响 | 漏洞仍在分析中 | 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 | 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 | 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 | 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。 【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 | 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 | 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 | 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 | 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 | 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue
Welcome To openEuler Community
Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.
Bot Usage Manual
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands. You can self-configure the PR merge rules for this repository. For more details, please refer to Here.
Contact Guide
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @alvin-ling, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .
| 参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-80590 | |||
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-80590 | |||
| https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-80590 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/linus/d5dc1e69fd7258ea605c9952e5d5947539159ae3 |
| http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-80590 | |||
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80590 | |||
| https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-80590 |
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
CVE-2026-80590
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassembly
A virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can mark
an IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.
inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the first
fragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including its
shinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragments
on frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.
After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) the
reassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), and
the next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on local
delivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slow
path - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walk
assumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes to
a tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough:
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2
RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0
udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0
inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340
skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0
__skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660
udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0
udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0
ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690
ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0
__netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110
netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0
tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790
tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550
tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x646/0x1130
</TASK>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
This runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. The
same is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag point
precedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwards
virtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added by
commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting
gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and by
commit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head
alloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmalloc
heads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sender
controls.
An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition and
cannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments and
the stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources are
affected. This has been reachable since
commit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the first
path that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Reset
the GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, in
inet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and
6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_list
members of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:
the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as they
are). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already accepted
on receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() in
ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.
Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducer
above, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reach
BUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6
fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatched
kernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact and
nothing is logged.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-80590
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassembly
A virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can mark
an IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.
inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the first
fragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including its
shinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragments
on frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.
After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) the
reassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), and
the next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on local
delivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slow
path - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walk
assumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes to
a tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough:
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2
RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0
udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0
inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340
skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0
__skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660
udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0
udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0
ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690
ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0
__netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110
netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0
tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790
tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550
tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x646/0x1130
</TASK>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
This runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. The
same is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag point
precedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwards
virtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added by
commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting
gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and by
commit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head
alloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmalloc
heads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sender
controls.
An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition and
cannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments and
the stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources are
affected. This has been reachable since
commit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the first
path that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Reset
the GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, in
inet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and
6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_list
members of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:
the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as they
are). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already accepted
on receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() in
ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.
Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducer
above, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reach
BUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6
fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatched
kernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact and
nothing is logged.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-80590
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassembly
A virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can mark
an IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.
inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the first
fragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including its
shinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragments
on frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.
After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) the
reassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), and
the next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on local
delivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slow
path - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walk
assumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes to
a tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough:
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2
RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0
udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0
inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340
skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0
__skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660
udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0
udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0
ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690
ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0
__netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110
netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0
tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790
tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550
tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x646/0x1130
</TASK>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
This runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. The
same is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag point
precedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwards
virtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added by
commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting
gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and by
commit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head
alloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmalloc
heads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sender
controls.
An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition and
cannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments and
the stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources are
affected. This has been reachable since
commit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the first
path that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Reset
the GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, in
inet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and
6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_list
members of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:
the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as they
are). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already accepted
on receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() in
ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.
Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducer
above, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reach
BUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6
fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatched
kernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact and
nothing is logged.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-80590
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassembly
A virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can mark
an IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.
inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the first
fragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including its
shinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragments
on frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.
After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) the
reassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), and
the next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on local
delivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slow
path - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walk
assumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes to
a tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough:
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2
RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0
udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0
inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340
skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0
__skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660
udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0
udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0
ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690
ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0
__netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110
netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0
tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790
tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550
tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x646/0x1130
</TASK>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
This runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. The
same is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag point
precedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwards
virtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added by
commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting
gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and by
commit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head
alloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmalloc
heads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sender
controls.
An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition and
cannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments and
the stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources are
affected. This has been reachable since
commit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the first
path that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Reset
the GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, in
inet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and
6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_list
members of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:
the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as they
are). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already accepted
on receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() in
ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.
Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducer
above, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reach
BUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6
fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatched
kernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact and
nothing is logged.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
8.6
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
zhang-changzhongsource: @hulk-ci-bot
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassembly
A virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can mark
an IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.
inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the first
fragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including its
shinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragments
on frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.
After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) the
reassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), and
the next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on local
delivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slow
path - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walk
assumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes to
a tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough:
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2
RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0
udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0
inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340
skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0
__skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660
udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0
udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0
ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690
ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0
__netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110
netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0
tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790
tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550
tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0
vfs_write+0x646/0x1130
</TASK>
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
This runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. The
same is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag point
precedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwards
virtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added by
commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting
gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and by
commit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head
alloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmalloc
heads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sender
controls.
An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition and
cannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments and
the stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources are
affected. This has been reachable since
commit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the first
path that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Reset
the GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, in
inet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and
6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_list
members of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:
the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as they
are). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already accepted
on receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() in
ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.
Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducer
above, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reach
BUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6
fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatched
kernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact and
nothing is logged.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
8.6
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@zhujianwei001 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 8.6 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
一、漏洞信息 __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ( net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list ) and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ( net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types ) do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ( tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr ), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-80590
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.18.40,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：8.6 High
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment s skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment() s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace:
漏洞公开时间：2026-08-28 16:16:42
漏洞创建时间：2026-08-28 16:58:22
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80590
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: frags: strip GSO state from fragments before reassemblyA virtio_net_hdr (tun/tap, or AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR) can markan IPv4 or IPv6 fragment as GSO; nothing relates gso_type to frag_off.inet_frag_reasm_prepare()/inet_frag_reasm_finish() keep the firstfragment's skb as the head of the reassembled datagram, including itsshinfo->gso_size/gso_type/gso_segs, and chain the remaining fragmentson frag_list with whatever linear/paged layout they arrived with.After ip_defrag() (ip_local_deliver(), nf_defrag_ipv4, ...) thereassembled skb therefore still claims to be GSO (SKB_GSO_DODGY), andthe next software segmentation point - udp_rcv_segment() on localdelivery, validate_xmit_skb(), or the ip_finish_output_gso() slowpath - hands it to skb_segment(). skb_segment()'s frag_list walkassumes GRO-shaped input and hits one of its BUG_ON()s. Two writes toa tap by an unprivileged user in its own userns are enough: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4899! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 82 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.2.0-pentest+ #2 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x20ca/0x48b0 Call Trace: <TASK> __udp_gso_segment+0x29a/0x27d0 udp4_ufo_fragment+0x458/0x6c0 inet_gso_segment+0x429/0x1340 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x233/0x4f0 __skb_gso_segment+0x308/0x660 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x440/0xad0 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0xc7/0x2c0 udp_rcv+0x16ce/0x2260 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x197/0x2d0 ip_local_deliver+0x430/0x690 ip_rcv+0x16f/0x1f0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x15e/0x1c0 __netif_receive_skb+0x1e/0x110 netif_receive_skb+0xf6/0x5c0 tun_rx_batched.isra.0+0x3ab/0x790 tun_get_user+0x17c3/0x3550 tun_chr_write_iter+0xba/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x646/0x1130 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interruptThis runs with BH disabled, so it is a panic rather than an oops. Thesame is reachable with CAP_NET_RAW in a netns where a defrag pointprecedes a GSO point, and from a guest whose VMM forwardsvirtio_net_hdr to a tap. The SKB_GSO_DODGY frag_list checks added bycommit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splittinggso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list") and bycommit 9e4b7a99a03a ("net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed headalloc types") do not cover it: page-backed heads skip them, and kmallocheads skip them when gso_size == skb_headlen(head), which the sendercontrols.An skb entering a frag queue is an IP fragment by definition andcannot legitimately carry GSO state: GRO does not merge fragments andthe stack segments before it fragments, so only untrusted sources areaffected. This has been reachable sincecommit f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr"), the firstpath that let userspace attach GSO metadata to an IP fragment. Resetthe GSO fields of every fragment as it is queued, ininet_frag_queue_insert(), which IPv4, IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm and6lowpan reassembly share; then neither the head nor the frag_listmembers of the reassembled skb carry them (the members matter too:the ip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() fast paths send them out as theyare). The head may remain CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; that is already acceptedon receive and resolved by skb_checksum_help() inip_do_fragment()/ip6_fragment() on forward.Tested on top of net.git (dc4b95b8fee9), x86_64: the tap reproducerabove, two further IPv4 frag_list geometries that reachBUG_ON(i >= nfrags) and BUG_ON(!list_skb->head_frag), and an IPv6fragment-header variant (udp6_ufo_fragment()) each panic the unpatchedkernel; with this patch all four datagrams are delivered intact andnothing is logged.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-80590 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
8.6
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不修复-超出修复范围
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复