检测到新建 CVE Issue，CVE-ID: CVE-2026-90414。
你可以通过以下两种方式使用 CVE 修复服务：
-
分支影响分析
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
/analysis_branches - 系统将自动分析各个分支是否受影响，并在本 Issue 下给出表格形式的分析结果；
- 在本 Issue 下评论：
-
在指定分支上创建 PR（修复提交）
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
branch、name、email为必填字段，每个字段单独一行）：
- 在本 Issue 下按如下格式评论（
/create_pr
branch: OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10
name: dev
email: dev@devstation.com
backport-engine: opencode
- 说明：
branch: 需要创建 PR 的目标分支列表，例如OLK-6.6 OLK-5.10；name: PR 签名人姓名（如责任人或安全负责人）；email: PR 签名人邮箱；backport-engine（可选）：可选portgpt、mystique或opencode；不填时默认使用opencode；
系统会根据上述信息自动在指定分支上创建 PR，并在本 Issue 下反馈结果。
provided by DevStation.
issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
分支状态 |
原因说明 | 使用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 | 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞； 受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）； 若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 | 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 | 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 | 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 | 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。 【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 | 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 | 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 | 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 | 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 | 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
Welcome To openEuler Community
Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.
Bot Usage Manual
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands. You can self-configure the PR merge rules for this repository. For more details, please refer to Here.
Contact Guide
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @alvin-ling, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chiqijun, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @howard_lu, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kunlun_spurs, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @nebulamatrix_rdma, @peterpangogogo, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @siyanteng, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
CVE-2026-90414
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
isert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers without
ever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placed
in the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - the
data-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS
(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -
out of the fixed-size descriptor:
isert_handle_iscsi_dataout():
sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc),
unsol_data_len);
isert_handle_scsi_cmd():
sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents,
isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);
Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, an
initiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actually
sent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read of
the receive buffer.
Nothing upstream of isert closes this door:
- __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against
conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter,
used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets
ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength;
and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in
iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is
adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively
raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive
descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and
the descriptor size are unrelated.
The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliases
the receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend as
the data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heap
contents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to the
backing store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlist
isert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes was
demonstrated.
Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that has
declared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength that
permits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segment
length exceeds what was received. With KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25
Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work
Call Trace:
sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0
isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390
__ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390
ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150
isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()
(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().
Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before the
PDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.
Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it also
rejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwise
be parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUs
shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject login
PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declared
length either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had no
length check at all.
isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()
returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment for
an AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly
[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sum
against wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHS
term would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth
---truncated---
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
9.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core's bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ("IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN")) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated--- |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 9.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-90414
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.12.33,6.18.18,6.18.40,6.18.48,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：9.1 Critical
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core s bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ( IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN )) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated---
漏洞公开时间：2026-09-18 23:42:58
漏洞创建时间：2026-09-19 00:10:46
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90414
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was receivedisert_recv_done() hands each received PDU to the opcode handlers withoutever looking at wc->byte_len, the number of bytes the HCA actually placedin the receive descriptor. The handlers then copy that many bytes - thedata-segment length the initiator declared in the BHS(ntoh24(hdr->dlength), via the derived unsol_data_len / imm_data_len) -out of the fixed-size descriptor: isert_handle_iscsi_dataout(): sg_copy_from_buffer(sg_start, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), unsol_data_len); isert_handle_scsi_cmd(): sg_copy_from_buffer(cmd->se_cmd.t_data_sg, sg_nents, isert_get_data(rx_desc), imm_data_len);Because the declared length is never checked against wc->byte_len, aninitiator can declare a data segment larger than the bytes it actuallysent (and larger than the descriptor) and cause an out-of-bounds read ofthe receive buffer.Nothing upstream of isert closes this door: - __iscsit_check_dataout_hdr() bounds the inbound payload against conn_ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength (MXDSL) - a transmit parameter, used here for the inbound check. - iscsi_set_connection_parameters() sets ops->MaxXmitDataSegmentLength = ops->TargetRecvDataSegmentLength; and TARGETRECVDATASEGMENTLENGTH is absent from the min()-clamp list in iscsi_check_acceptor_state(), so the value the initiator declares is adopted verbatim (type range 512..16777215). The initiator effectively raises its own ceiling. - isert never clamps the negotiated value to its own fixed receive descriptor (ISER_RX_SIZE, 9216 bytes), so the target core s bound and the descriptor size are unrelated.The imm_data_len == data_len path is more than an over-read: it aliasesthe receive descriptor via sg_set_buf() and passes it to the backend asthe data source for the SCSI WRITE, so an over-declared length causes heapcontents past the descriptor to be written through the backend to thebacking store. The backend is the victim of the oversized scatterlistisert hands it, not the cause; no read-back of the written bytes wasdemonstrated.Trigger: after login completes (full feature phase), an initiator that hasdeclared a large TargetRecvDataSegmentLength and a FirstBurstLength thatpermits unsolicited/immediate data sends a PDU whose declared data-segmentlength exceeds what was received. With KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 Read of size 4096 at addr ffff888109720800 by task kworker/1:0H/25 Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work Call Trace: sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 isert_recv_done+0xba6/0x2390 __ib_process_cq+0xe1/0x390 ib_cq_poll_work+0x46/0x150isert_recv_done+0xba6 resolves to isert_handle_iscsi_dataout()(ib_isert.c:1160), inlined through isert_rx_opcode().Validate wc->byte_len against the framing in isert_recv_done() before thePDU reaches any handler, and reinstate the connection if it is short.Because the test compares without subtracting the header length, it alsorejects PDUs shorter than the iSER and iSCSI headers, which would otherwisebe parsed out of stale descriptor contents. The login handler rejects PDUsshorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (commit 29e7b925ae6d ( IB/isert: Reject loginPDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN )) but does not bound the declaredlength either; that is fixed in the next patch. The data handlers had nolength check at all.isert reads the data segment from a fixed offset: isert_get_data()returns the iSER header plus ISER_HEADERS_LEN and makes no adjustment foran AHS. The bytes the handlers touch are therefore exactly[ISER_HEADERS_LEN, ISER_HEADERS_LEN + dlength), and comparing that sumagainst wc->byte_len bounds precisely the region that is read. An AHSterm would only make the test stricter without bounding anything furth---truncated---
openEuler评分：
9.1
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围