issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
分支状态 |
原因说明 | 使用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 | 受影响且需要修复（包含升级版本修复）的漏洞； 受影响且已经修复的漏洞（历史修复PR也需要关联issue）； 若因特殊原因无法修复，应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】，并在安委会备案相关情况。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 | 已关注到相关漏洞，正在处理，未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 | 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 | 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 | 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞，或评估后无法升级修复，应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。 【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 | 软件不受影响，因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 | 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 | 易受攻击的组件存在，并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是，易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 | 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问，包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 | 产品不受影响，因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是，有问题的组件存在，但由于某种原因（例如安全的编译器选项）使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue
openeuler-ci-botWelcome To openEuler Community
Hey @openeuler-ci-bot , thanks for your contribution to the community.
Bot Usage Manual
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here . That means you can comment below every pull request or issue to trigger Bot Commands. You can self-configure the PR merge rules for this repository. For more details, please refer to Here.
Contact Guide
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel ,
and any of the maintainers: @hanjunguo, @oekernel, @sanglipeng, @wkfxxx, @zeng_zhaorong ,
and any of the committers: @CTC-XiboWang, @Frank_Sae, @GoGo_phytium, @GongLei-, @LiuYongQiang0816, @SuperSix173, @Tankll2021, @TrueAI, @YiweiZ, @allen-shi, @alvin-ling, @baratta, @bibo_mao, @caixu-blue, @chen-jun-hw, @chenjiesong, @chenjunxin1992, @chenke2026, @chenxiaosonggitcode, @chiqijun, @chizl, @chriszjh, @duanqiangwen, @eingesch, @fangfeng123, @fanghaiqinghw, @gang_he, @gaojuxin09, @gouhao2022, @guohaocs2c, @guzitao, @hanjunguo, @hanliyang, @hellotcc, @henryze, @hewanhan, @hjx_gitff, @hongwu-wang, @howard_lu, @htforge, @hu-chunzhi, @hunan4222, @hygmm, @jackknight, @jerry_lilijun, @jiayi0118, @junlong-zheng, @juntianlinux, @kailiu42, @kaitiandu, @kazero00, @kevinzhu1, @kile2009, @klmengkd, @koishimind, @kongzizaixian, @kunlun_spurs, @kylin-mayukun, @leoliu-oc, @li-huisong, @linan888, @linyunsheng, @liulongfang, @liyihang0226, @lostway1, @lujialin2, @mao-hongbo, @markyuan4ta21, @mawupeng, @mingqian218472, @mingrui-liu, @mufengyan, @nebulamatrix_rdma, @peterpangogogo, @pigalsofine, @robinorg, @rock_hw, @sageDriver, @sanglipeng, @shu-shengming, @shuaijiakun, @sinat_17738335, @siyanteng, @sming56_admin, @stavewu, @stkid, @sun_nanyong, @wangboe2022, @wanghang73, @wenzhiwei11, @whoisxxx, @wkfxxx, @woqidaideshi, @wsoydl, @xingmz1, @xukuohai, @yeweihua999, @ygn-ndwd-official, @yonghu_4dc5, @young-sun, @yubo-liu1, @yuehaibing_planb, @yuzenghui1, @zhang-changzhong, @zhangyi089, @zhujianwei001, @zichengqu, @zouyipeng, @zqiao216 .
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
openeuler-ci-botopenEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
经过cve-manager解析，部分字段填写错误，如红色字体所示：
影响性分析说明:
(请填写此字段)
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
原因说明：
1.master:(请填写此字段)
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:(请填写此字段)
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:(请填写此字段)
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:(请填写此字段)
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:(请填写此字段)
source: @hulk-ci-bot
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()
sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,
because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomic
operations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).
sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flags
is changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, through
sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).
sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flags
without the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,
sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in a
separate patch.
Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-free
caused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()
can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,
because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word.
CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW)
read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F
compute F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) compute F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)
store F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE)
sk_add_node_rcu(sk, ...)
store F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)
After the lost update, SOCK_RCU_FREE is clear while the socket is
visible to lockless UDP receive lookups. sk_destruct() then frees
the socket immediately instead of waiting for a RCU grace period,
while the receive path still holds a reference-less pointer to it:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888008806610 by task exploit/207
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 207 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.12.95+ #1
ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410
udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x51c/0x1180
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x109/0x350
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x14b/0x310
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x29d/0x390
ip_local_deliver+0x24d/0x2a0
Only grab the socket lock when SOCK_TIMESTAMP has to be set,
to keep the common case lockless.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-98276 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomicoperations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flagsis changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, throughsock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flagswithout the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in aseparate patch.Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-freecaused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word. CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW) -------------------------------- ---------------------------- read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F compute F |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 7.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，所有PR均已合入
source: @hulk-ci-bot
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()
sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,
because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomic
operations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).
sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flags
is changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, through
sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).
sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flags
without the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,
sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in a
separate patch.
Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-free
caused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()
can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,
because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word.
CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW)
read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F
compute F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) compute F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)
store F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE)
sk_add_node_rcu(sk, ...)
store F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)
After the lost update, SOCK_RCU_FREE is clear while the socket is
visible to lockless UDP receive lookups. sk_destruct() then frees
the socket immediately instead of waiting for a RCU grace period,
while the receive path still holds a reference-less pointer to it:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888008806610 by task exploit/207
CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 207 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.12.95+ #1
ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410
udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x51c/0x1180
udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x109/0x350
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x14b/0x310
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x29d/0x390
ip_local_deliver+0x24d/0x2a0
Only grab the socket lock when SOCK_TIMESTAMP has to be set,
to keep the common case lockless.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-98276 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
7.8
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
@wkfxxx 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomicoperations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flagsis changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, throughsock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flagswithout the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in aseparate patch.Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-freecaused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word. CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW) -------------------------------- ---------------------------- read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F compute F |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 7.8 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
经过cve-manager解析，部分分支PR未合入，如红色字体所示：
原因说明：
1.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复(PR未合入)
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复(PR未合入)
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复(PR未合入)
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2026-98276
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.18.40,6.18.48,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS评分：
BaseScore：7.8 High
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomicoperations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flagsis changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, throughsock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flagswithout the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in aseparate patch.Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-freecaused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word. CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW) -------------------------------- ---------------------------- read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F compute F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) compute F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP) store F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) sk_add_node_rcu(sk, ...) store F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)After the lost update, SOCK_RCU_FREE is clear while the socket isvisible to lockless UDP receive lookups. sk_destruct() then freesthe socket immediately instead of waiting for a RCU grace period,while the receive path still holds a reference-less pointer to it: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888008806610 by task exploit/207 CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 207 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.12.95+ #1 ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x51c/0x1180 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x109/0x350 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x14b/0x310 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x29d/0x390 ip_local_deliver+0x24d/0x2a0Only grab the socket lock when SOCK_TIMESTAMP has to be set,to keep the common case lockless.
漏洞公开时间：2026-10-06 17:54:06
漏洞创建时间：2026-10-06 19:47:26
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98276
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息：
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()sk->sk_flags must only be changed while holding the socket lock,because sock_set_flag() and sock_reset_flag() use non atomicoperations (__set_bit() and __clear_bit()).sock_gettstamp() is one of the last places where a bit of sk->sk_flagsis changed from a syscall without owning the socket lock, throughsock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP).sk_set_memalloc() and sk_clear_memalloc() also change sk->sk_flagswithout the socket lock, but their callers (nbd, iscsi_tcp, nvme-tcp,sunrpc, wireguard) need a careful audit, this will be addressed in aseparate patch.Jungwoo Lee and Wongi Lee reported an UDP socket use-after-freecaused by this bug: a SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW ioctl racing with bind()can cancel the SOCK_RCU_FREE bit that udp_lib_get_port() just set,because both threads perform a read-modify-write on the same word. CPU 0 (bind) CPU 1 (SIOCGSTAMPNS_NEW) -------------------------------- ---------------------------- read sk_flags = F read sk_flags = F compute F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) compute F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP) store F | BIT(SOCK_RCU_FREE) sk_add_node_rcu(sk, ...) store F | BIT(SOCK_TIMESTAMP)After the lost update, SOCK_RCU_FREE is clear while the socket isvisible to lockless UDP receive lookups. sk_destruct() then freesthe socket immediately instead of waiting for a RCU grace period,while the receive path still holds a reference-less pointer to it: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888008806610 by task exploit/207 CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 207 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.12.95+ #1 ipv4_pktinfo_prepare+0x30/0x410 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x51c/0x1180 udp_unicast_rcv_skb+0x109/0x350 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x14b/0x310 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x29d/0x390 ip_local_deliver+0x24d/0x2a0Only grab the socket lock when SOCK_TIMESTAMP has to be set,to keep the common case lockless.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-98276 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
7.8
Vector：CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.18.40):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.master(6.18.40):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不修复-超出修复范围
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):正常修复
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(6.6.0):正常修复