issue处理注意事项:
1. 提交正常修复分支的修复PR时,必须关联当前issue,否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复;
注: 内容的关键词(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(2.3.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(2.3.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):
原因说明:
1.master(2.3.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意:版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应,例如master版本分支受影响,那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!):
分支状态 |
原因说明 | 使用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 | 受影响且需要修复(包含升级版本修复)的漏洞; 受影响且已经修复的漏洞(历史修复PR也需要关联issue); 若因特殊原因无法修复,应修改原因说明为【不修复-特殊原因】,并在安委会备案相关情况。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 | 已关注到相关漏洞,正在处理,未明确漏洞影响和修复方案。 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 | 当前没有可用的修复或补救措施。【影响性分析】中应包含有关为什么没有修复或补救措施的详细说明、上游相关PR等。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 | 没有漏洞的修复计划。当版本停维、软件包宣布生命周期终止或弃用使用。 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 | 如存在其他特殊情况不修复相关漏洞,或评估后无法升级修复,应在openEuler社区安全委员会例会进行说明备案。 【影响性分析】中应包含不发布修复的详细说明、特殊情况还应有安委会会议纪要。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 | 软件不受影响,因为易受攻击的组件不在产品中。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 | 内置的内联控制或缓解措施可防止攻击者利用漏洞 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 | 易受攻击的组件存在,并且该组件包含易受攻击的代码。但是,易受攻击的代码的使用方式使得攻击者无法进行任何预期的攻击。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 | 易受影响的代码在执行过程中不可访问,包括产品的非预期状态。产品不使用也不执行的组件。 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 | 产品不受影响,因为漏洞背后的代码在产品中不存在。与component_not_present不同的是,有问题的组件存在,但由于某种原因(例如安全的编译器选项)使漏洞的特定代码不存在于组件中。 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://docs.atomgit.com/docs/help/home/org_project/pullrequests/pr-related-issue


| 参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2026-97687 | None | None | https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/07408cec79d1856d81bb42c74a904a24fdb9e465 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/b6447295fff7b38fdffc67e0df9712d60cef3cc3 |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2026-97687 | |||
| https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-97687 | None | None | https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/07408cec79d1856d81bb42c74a904a24fdb9e465 https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/b6447295fff7b38fdffc67e0df9712d60cef3cc3 |
| http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2026-97687 | |||
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97687 | |||
| https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-97687 | None | None | https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/07408cec79d1856d81bb42c74a904a24fdb9e465 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/project https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/commit/b6447295fff7b38fdffc67e0df9712d60cef3cc3 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1


经过cve-manager解析,(所有PR均已合入)


一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2026-97687
漏洞归属组件:python-urllib3
漏洞归属的版本:1.24.3,1.25.9,1.26.12,1.26.16,1.26.18,1.26.3,1.26.7,2.3.0
CVSS评分:
BaseScore:7.6 High
Vector:CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
漏洞简述:
urllib3 is an HTTP client library for Python. From 1.26.0 until 2.8.0, the proxy_ssl_context, proxy_assert_hostname, proxy_assert_fingerprint, ssl_context, cert_reqs, verify_mode, use_forwarding_for_https=True, and CERT_NONE configuration paths fail to remain separated because target-server TLS settings are incorrectly applied to the HTTPS proxy connection. The trigger is that an application uses an HTTPS proxy and configures target-server TLS settings that must remain separate from the proxy TLS handshake, including HTTPS forwarding with target-specific identity or credentials. Applying cert_reqs=CERT_NONE can overwrite proxy_ssl_context.verify_mode in place, and the mutation persists so later connections reusing the same context may connect to the HTTPS proxy without certificate verification. The attack mechanism is that an attacker intercepts and impersonates the HTTPS proxy after the effective proxy policy accepts the attacker s certificate. The impact is that the attacker can observe or modify forwarded traffic or receive a target TLS client certificate, while CONNECT tunneling still preserves the separate end-to-end target TLS connection. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.0.
漏洞公开时间:2026-09-30 00:17:18
漏洞创建时间:2026-10-14 06:37:49
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97687
更多参考(点击展开)
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://atomgit.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台
漏洞补丁信息:
详情(点击展开)
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
urllib3 is an HTTP client library for Python. From 1.26.0 until 2.8.0, the proxy_ssl_context, proxy_assert_hostname, proxy_assert_fingerprint, ssl_context, cert_reqs, verify_mode, use_forwarding_for_https=True, and CERT_NONE configuration paths fail to remain separated because target-server TLS settings are incorrectly applied to the HTTPS proxy connection. The trigger is that an application uses an HTTPS proxy and configures target-server TLS settings that must remain separate from the proxy TLS handshake, including HTTPS forwarding with target-specific identity or credentials. Applying cert_reqs=CERT_NONE can overwrite proxy_ssl_context.verify_mode in place, and the mutation persists so later connections reusing the same context may connect to the HTTPS proxy without certificate verification. The attack mechanism is that an attacker intercepts and impersonates the HTTPS proxy after the effective proxy policy accepts the attacker s certificate. The impact is that the attacker can observe or modify forwarded traffic or receive a target TLS client certificate, while CONNECT tunneling still preserves the separate end-to-end target TLS connection. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.0.
openEuler评分:
7.6
Vector:CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(2.3.0):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(2.3.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):否
原因说明:
1.master(2.3.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(1.25.9):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.12):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(1.26.18):正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(1.26.18):正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(1.26.18):正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4(1.26.18):正常修复