| 文件 | 最后提交记录 | 最后更新时间 |
|---|---|---|
can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol SAE J1939 is the vehicle bus recommended practice used for communication and diagnostics among vehicle components. Originating in the car and heavy-duty truck industry in the United States, it is now widely used in other parts of the world. J1939, ISO 11783 and NMEA 2000 all share the same high level protocol. SAE J1939 can be considered the replacement for the older SAE J1708 and SAE J1587 specifications. Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Elenita Hinds <ecathinds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Signed-off-by: Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@mobile-devices.fr> Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> | 6 年前 | |
can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol SAE J1939 is the vehicle bus recommended practice used for communication and diagnostics among vehicle components. Originating in the car and heavy-duty truck industry in the United States, it is now widely used in other parts of the world. J1939, ISO 11783 and NMEA 2000 all share the same high level protocol. SAE J1939 can be considered the replacement for the older SAE J1708 and SAE J1587 specifications. Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender <bst@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Elenita Hinds <ecathinds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be> Signed-off-by: Maxime Jayat <maxime.jayat@mobile-devices.fr> Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> | 6 年前 | |
can: j1939: do not wait 250 ms if the same addr was already claimed The ISO 11783-5 standard, in "4.5.2 - Address claim requirements", states: d) No CF shall begin, or resume, transmission on the network until 250 ms after it has successfully claimed an address except when responding to a request for address-claimed. But "Figure 6" and "Figure 7" in "4.5.4.2 - Address-claim prioritization" show that the CF begins the transmission after 250 ms from the first AC (address-claimed) message even if it sends another AC message during that time window to resolve the address contention with another CF. As stated in "4.4.2.3 - Address-claimed message": In order to successfully claim an address, the CF sending an address claimed message shall not receive a contending claim from another CF for at least 250 ms. As stated in "4.4.3.2 - NAME management (NM) message": 1) A commanding CF can d) request that a CF with a specified NAME transmit the address- claimed message with its current NAME. 2) A target CF shall d) send an address-claimed message in response to a request for a matching NAME Taking the above arguments into account, the 250 ms wait is requested only during network initialization. Do not restart the timer on AC message if both the NAME and the address match and so if the address has already been claimed (timer has expired) or the AC message has been sent to resolve the contention with another CF (timer is still running). Signed-off-by: Devid Antonio Filoni <devid.filoni@egluetechnologies.com> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221125170418.34575-1-devid.filoni@egluetechnologies.com Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> | 3 年前 | |
can: j1939: j1939_local_ecu_get(): undo increment when j1939_local_ecu_get() fails [ Upstream commit 06e02da29f6f1a45fc07bd60c7eaf172dc21e334 ] Since j1939_sk_bind() and j1939_sk_release() call j1939_local_ecu_put() when J1939_SOCK_BOUND was already set, but the error handling path for j1939_sk_bind() will not set J1939_SOCK_BOUND when j1939_local_ecu_get() fails, j1939_local_ecu_get() needs to undo priv->ents[sa].nusers++ when j1939_local_ecu_get() returns an error. Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/e7f80046-4ff7-4ce2-8ad8-7c3c678a42c9@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit deedea599e87d5eaf187691ec0435c979540c457) | 10 个月前 | |
can: j1939: Fix UAF in j1939_sk_match_filter during setsockopt(SO_J1939_FILTER) commit efe7cf828039aedb297c1f9920b638fffee6aabc upstream. Lock jsk->sk to prevent UAF when setsockopt(..., SO_J1939_FILTER, ...) modifies jsk->filters while receiving packets. Following trace was seen on affected system: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012144014 by task j1939/350 CPU: 0 PID: 350 Comm: j1939 Tainted: G W OE 6.5.0-rc5 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: print_report+0xd3/0x620 ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x7d/0x200 ? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939] kasan_report+0xc2/0x100 ? j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939] __asan_load4+0x84/0xb0 j1939_sk_recv_match_one+0x1af/0x2d0 [can_j1939] j1939_sk_recv+0x20b/0x320 [can_j1939] ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20 ? __pfx_j1939_sk_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939] ? j1939_simple_recv+0x69/0x280 [can_j1939] ? j1939_ac_recv+0x5e/0x310 [can_j1939] j1939_can_recv+0x43f/0x580 [can_j1939] ? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939] ? raw_rcv+0x42/0x3c0 [can_raw] ? __pfx_j1939_can_recv+0x10/0x10 [can_j1939] can_rcv_filter+0x11f/0x350 [can] can_receive+0x12f/0x190 [can] ? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can] can_rcv+0xdd/0x130 [can] ? __pfx_can_rcv+0x10/0x10 [can] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x13d/0x150 ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_write+0x18/0x20 ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x8c/0xe0 __netif_receive_skb+0x23/0xb0 process_backlog+0x107/0x260 __napi_poll+0x69/0x310 net_rx_action+0x2a1/0x580 ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 ? handle_irq_event+0x7d/0xa0 __do_softirq+0xf3/0x3f8 do_softirq+0x53/0x80 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6e/0x70 netif_rx+0x16b/0x180 can_send+0x32b/0x520 [can] ? __pfx_can_send+0x10/0x10 [can] ? __check_object_size+0x299/0x410 raw_sendmsg+0x572/0x6d0 [can_raw] ? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw] ? apparmor_socket_sendmsg+0x2f/0x40 ? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10 [can_raw] sock_sendmsg+0xef/0x100 sock_write_iter+0x162/0x220 ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10 ? __rtnl_unlock+0x47/0x80 ? security_file_permission+0x54/0x320 vfs_write+0x6ba/0x750 ? __pfx_vfs_write+0x10/0x10 ? __fget_light+0x1ca/0x1f0 ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x280 ksys_write+0x143/0x170 ? __pfx_ksys_write+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x62/0x70 __x64_sys_write+0x47/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x90 ? irqentry_exit+0x3f/0x50 ? exc_page_fault+0x79/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Allocated by task 348: kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1f/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xc0 __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x67/0x160 j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x284/0x450 [can_j1939] __sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Freed by task 349: kasan_save_stack+0x2a/0x50 kasan_set_track+0x29/0x40 kasan_save_free_info+0x2f/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x1c0 __kmem_cache_free+0x1b9/0x380 kfree+0x7a/0x120 j1939_sk_setsockopt+0x3b2/0x450 [can_j1939] __sys_setsockopt+0x15c/0x2f0 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x6b/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Fixes: 9d71dd0c70099 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Reported-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Sili Luo <rootlab@huawei.com> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231020133814.383996-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2 年前 | |
net: can: j1939: Initialize unused data in j1939_send_one() commit b7cdf1dd5d2a2d8200efd98d1893684db48fe134 upstream. syzbot reported kernel-infoleak in raw_recvmsg() [1]. j1939_send_one() creates full frame including unused data, but it doesn't initialize it. This causes the kernel-infoleak issue. Fix this by initializing unused data. [1] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] copy_to_user_iter lib/iov_iter.c:24 [inline] iterate_ubuf include/linux/iov_iter.h:29 [inline] iterate_and_advance2 include/linux/iov_iter.h:245 [inline] iterate_and_advance include/linux/iov_iter.h:271 [inline] _copy_to_iter+0x366/0x2520 lib/iov_iter.c:185 copy_to_iter include/linux/uio.h:196 [inline] memcpy_to_msg include/linux/skbuff.h:4113 [inline] raw_recvmsg+0x2b8/0x9e0 net/can/raw.c:1008 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1046 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x340 net/socket.c:1068 ____sys_recvmsg+0x18a/0x620 net/socket.c:2803 ___sys_recvmsg+0x223/0x840 net/socket.c:2845 do_recvmmsg+0x4fc/0xfd0 net/socket.c:2939 __sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3018 [inline] __do_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3041 [inline] __se_sys_recvmmsg net/socket.c:3034 [inline] __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x397/0x490 net/socket.c:3034 x64_sys_call+0xf6c/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x613/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35b/0x7a0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1313 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0xc8/0xbf0 net/core/skbuff.c:6504 sock_alloc_send_pskb+0xa81/0xbf0 net/core/sock.c:2795 sock_alloc_send_skb include/net/sock.h:1842 [inline] j1939_sk_alloc_skb net/can/j1939/socket.c:878 [inline] j1939_sk_send_loop net/can/j1939/socket.c:1142 [inline] j1939_sk_sendmsg+0xc0a/0x2730 net/can/j1939/socket.c:1277 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2584 ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2638 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2676 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2674 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2674 x64_sys_call+0xc4b/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Bytes 12-15 of 16 are uninitialized Memory access of size 16 starts at ffff888120969690 Data copied to user address 00000000200017c0 CPU: 1 PID: 5050 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00031-g71b1543c83d6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5681e40d297b30f5b513@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5681e40d297b30f5b513 Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240517035953.2617090-1-syoshida@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 1 年前 | |
can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): call j1939_priv_put() immediately when j1939_local_ecu_get() failed [ Upstream commit f214744c8a27c3c1da6b538c232da22cd027530e ] Commit 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct callback") expects that a call to j1939_priv_put() can be unconditionally delayed until j1939_sk_sock_destruct() is called. But a refcount leak will happen when j1939_sk_bind() is called again after j1939_local_ecu_get() from previous j1939_sk_bind() call returned an error. We need to call j1939_priv_put() before j1939_sk_bind() returns an error. Fixes: 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct callback") Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4f49a1bc-a528-42ad-86c0-187268ab6535@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 1e1adfffd3fef9c1374e607d225ce8ce87a79d91) | 10 个月前 | |
can: j1939: fix lockless local-destination check [ Upstream commit e4e8af62adab2fdcca230006f829407a953070cd ] j1939_priv.ents[].nusers is documented as protected by priv->lock, and its updates already happen under that lock. j1939_can_recv() also reads it under read_lock_bh(). However, j1939_session_skb_queue() and j1939_tp_send() still read priv->ents[da].nusers without taking the lock. Those transport-side checks decide whether to set J1939_ECU_LOCAL_DST, so they can race with j1939_local_ecu_get() and j1939_local_ecu_put() while userspace is binding or releasing sockets concurrently with TP traffic. This can misclassify TP/ETP sessions as local or remote and take the wrong transport path. Fix both transport paths by routing the destination-locality check through a helper that reads ents[].nusers under read_lock_bh(&priv->lock). Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk> Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260419140614.GA4041240@chcpu16 Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit b8f591ee8b9f71f442d715116d67570f6584bbca) Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com> | 4 天前 |
| 文件 | 最后提交记录 | 最后更新时间 |
|---|---|---|
| 6 年前 | ||
| 6 年前 | ||
| 3 年前 | ||
| 10 个月前 | ||
| 2 年前 | ||
| 1 年前 | ||
| 10 个月前 | ||
| 4 天前 |