MMichael Ellermanselftests/powerpc/ptrace: Update ptrace-perf watchpoint selftest
| 文件 | 最后提交记录 | 最后更新时间 |
|---|---|---|
powerpc/selftests: Add selftest to test concurrent perf/ptrace events ptrace and perf watchpoints can't co-exists if their address range overlaps. See commit 29da4f91c0c1 ("powerpc/watchpoint: Don't allow concurrent perf and ptrace events") for more detail. Add selftest for the same. Sample o/p: # ./ptrace-perf-hwbreak test: ptrace-perf-hwbreak tags: git_version:powerpc-5.8-7-118-g937fa174a15d-dirty perf cpu event -> ptrace thread event (Overlapping): Ok perf cpu event -> ptrace thread event (Non-overlapping): Ok perf thread event -> ptrace same thread event (Overlapping): Ok perf thread event -> ptrace same thread event (Non-overlapping): Ok perf thread event -> ptrace other thread event: Ok ptrace thread event -> perf kernel event: Ok ptrace thread event -> perf same thread event (Overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf same thread event (Non-overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf other thread event: Ok ptrace thread event -> perf cpu event (Overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf cpu event (Non-overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf same thread & cpu event (Overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf same thread & cpu event (Non-overlapping): Ok ptrace thread event -> perf other thread & cpu event: Ok success: ptrace-perf-hwbreak Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210412112218.128183-5-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com | 5 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Update ptrace-perf watchpoint selftest Now that ptrace and perf are no longer exclusive, update the test to exercise interesting interactions. An assembly file is used for the children to allow precise instruction choice and addresses, while avoiding any compiler quirks. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230801011744.153973-7-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Do more of ptrace-gpr in asm The ptrace-gpr test includes some inline asm to load GPR and FPR registers. It then goes back to C to wait for the parent to trace it and then checks register contents. The split between inline asm and C is fragile, it relies on the compiler not using any non-volatile GPRs after the inline asm block. It also requires a very large and unwieldy inline asm block. So convert the logic to set registers, wait, and store registers to a single asm function, meaning there's no window for the compiler to intervene. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627140239.2464900-10-mpe@ellerman.id.au | 4 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Add peek/poke of FPRs Currently the ptrace-gpr test only tests the GET/SET(FP)REGS ptrace APIs. But there's an alternate (older) API, called PEEK/POKEUSR. Add some minimal testing of PEEK/POKEUSR of the FPRs. This is sufficient to detect the bug that was fixed recently in the 32-bit ptrace FPR handling. Depends-on: 8e1278444446 ("powerpc/32: Fix overread/overwrite of thread_struct via ptrace") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627140239.2464900-13-mpe@ellerman.id.au | 4 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Convert to load/store doubles Some of the ptrace tests check the contents of floating pointer registers. Currently these use float, which is always 4 bytes, but the ptrace API supports saving/restoring 8 bytes per register, so switch to using doubles to exercise the code more fully. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627140239.2464900-8-mpe@ellerman.id.au | 4 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Declare test temporary variables as volatile While the target is volatile, the temporary variables used to access the target cast away the volatile. This is undefined behaviour, and a compiler may optimise away/reorder these accesses, breaking the test. This was observed with GCC 13.1.1, but it can be difficult to reproduce because of the dependency on compiler behaviour. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-5-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Update ptrace-perf watchpoint selftest Now that ptrace and perf are no longer exclusive, update the test to exercise interesting interactions. An assembly file is used for the children to allow precise instruction choice and addresses, while avoiding any compiler quirks. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230801011744.153973-7-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Update ptrace-perf watchpoint selftest Now that ptrace and perf are no longer exclusive, update the test to exercise interesting interactions. An assembly file is used for the children to allow precise instruction choice and addresses, while avoiding any compiler quirks. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230801011744.153973-7-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc: New PTRACE_SYSEMU test This patch adds a new test for the new PTRACE_SYSEMU ptrace request. This test also relies on PTRACE_GETREGS and PTRACE_SETREGS requests to run properly, since the trace instruction (gettid() syscall) is being modified at run-time (by PTRACE_SETREGS) and re-executed three times. PTRACE_GETREGS is being used to check that the registers are still sane. This test basically creates a child process that executes syscalls and the parent process check if it is being traced appropriately. The parent process guarantees that the SYSCALLs are being traced, with PTRACE_SYSEMU, and ptrace stops the child application before a syscall is executed. The way the tests validates it, is by guaranteeing that the system calls arguments, as argv[0] (r3) which is the same register that will have the syscall return value on powerpc, are not being corrupted on PTRACE_SYSEMU with a return value, i.e, it continues to have the current arguments instead, meaning that the registers where not clobbered. This test is basically the same test for x86 located at tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c, limited to test PTRACE_SYSEMU request, and ported to PowerPC. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> | 7 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 7 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc/ptrace: Explain why tests are skipped Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro. Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230725005841.28854-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 2 年前 | |
treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 7 年前 | |
selftests/powerpc: Use mfspr/mtspr macros No need to write inline asm for mtspr/mfspr, we have macros for this in reg.h Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221128041948.58339-2-bgray@linux.ibm.com | 3 年前 |